BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33625843)

  • 41. Outcome-dependent sampling with interval-censored failure time data.
    Zhou Q; Cai J; Zhou H
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28771664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparative investigation of methods for longitudinal data with limits of detection through a case study.
    Fu P; Hughes J; Zeng G; Hanook S; Orem J; Mwanda OW; Remick SC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):153-66. PubMed ID: 22504231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Simulation studies on the estimation of total area under the curve in the presence of right-tailed censoring.
    Bonate PL
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2015 Feb; 42(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 25367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Percentile estimation using variable censored data.
    Caudill SP; Wong LY; Turner WE; Lee R; Henderson A; Patterson DG
    Chemosphere; 2007 May; 68(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 17267011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Censored correlated cytokine concentrations: multivariate Tobit regression using clustered variance estimation.
    Andersen A; Benn CS; Jørgensen MJ; Ravn H
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2859-74. PubMed ID: 23212926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nonparametric methods for measurements below detection limit.
    Zhang D; Fan C; Zhang J; Zhang CH
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):700-15. PubMed ID: 19035469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tobit regression for modeling mean survival time using data subject to multiple sources of censoring.
    Gong Q; Schaubel DE
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Mar; 17(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 29359427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accounting for undetected compounds in statistical analyses of mass spectrometry 'omic studies.
    Taylor SL; Leiserowitz GS; Kim K
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Dec; 12(6):703-22. PubMed ID: 24246290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comment on "Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias".
    Hites RA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15554-15555. PubMed ID: 34694788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
    Shoari N; Dubé JS
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Limitation of inverse probability-of-censoring weights in estimating survival in the presence of strong selection bias.
    Howe CJ; Cole SR; Chmiel JS; Muñoz A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 21289029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Simulating survival data with predefined censoring rates for proportional hazards models.
    Wan F
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):838-854. PubMed ID: 27873333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Setting Alert and Action Limits in the Presence of Significant Amount of Censoring in Data.
    Novick SJ; Zhao W; Yang H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 27516490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pseudo-observations for competing risks with covariate dependent censoring.
    Binder N; Gerds TA; Andersen PK
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2014 Apr; 20(2):303-15. PubMed ID: 23430270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimating the odds ratio when exposure has a limit of detection.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Nie L; Schisterman EF
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1674-80. PubMed ID: 19667054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of censoring assumptions to reduce bias in tuberculosis treatment cohort analyses.
    Brooks MB; Mitnick CD; Manjourides J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240297. PubMed ID: 33075072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Selection bias introduced by informative censoring in studies examining effects of vaccination in infancy.
    López-López JA; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 48(6):2001-2009. PubMed ID: 31071211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Response to Comment on "Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias".
    George BJ; Thomas KW; Simmons JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15556-15557. PubMed ID: 34704749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quantile regression for exposure data with repeated measures in the presence of non-detects.
    Chen IC; Bertke SJ; Curwin BD
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 34108633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.