These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33626112)

  • 1. Comparison of IOTA three-step strategy and logistic regression model LR2 for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Hidalgo JJ; Llueca A; Zolfaroli I; Veiga N; Ortiz E; Alcázar JL
    Med Ultrason; 2021 May; 23(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33626112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
    Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving diagnostic strategies for ovarian cancer in Filipino women using ultrasound imaging and a multivariate index assay.
    Velayo CL; Reforma KN; Sicam RVG; Diwa MH; Sy ADR; Tantengco OAG
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 81():102253. PubMed ID: 36179631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diagnostic efficiency between IOTA LR2 model and doctors
    Zhao B; Fu Y; Wen L; Wang Z; Fu C; Liu M
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Aug; 47(8):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 36097776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective evaluation of the IOTA logistic regression model LR2 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Nunes N; Yazbek J; Ambler G; Hoo W; Naftalin J; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 22223587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology.
    Ameye L; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Paladini D; Zhang J; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Savelli L; Veldman J; Testa AC; Amant F; Van Huffel S; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 22511559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.
    Sayasneh A; Wynants L; Preisler J; Kaijser J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Ghaem-Maghami S; Epstein E; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(12):2448-54. PubMed ID: 23674083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.