These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33626112)
21. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training. Sayasneh A; Wynants L; Preisler J; Kaijser J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Ghaem-Maghami S; Epstein E; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(12):2448-54. PubMed ID: 23674083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence. Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model. Esquivel Villabona AL; Rodríguez JN; Ayala N; Buriticá C; Gómez AC; Velandia AM; Rodríguez N; Alcázar JL J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simple descriptors and simple rules of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group: a prospective study of combined use for the description of adnexal masses. Peces Rama A; Llanos Llanos MC; Sánchez Ferrer ML; Alcázar Zambrano JL; Martínez Mendoza A; Nieto Díaz A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():7-11. PubMed ID: 26461961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation. Alcázar JL; Pascual MÁ; Olartecoechea B; Graupera B; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Hereter L; Julve R; Gastón B; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Saba L; Guerriero S Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 23576304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China. Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating use of two-step International Ovarian Tumor Analysis strategy to classify adnexal masses identified in pregnancy: pilot study. Barcroft J; Pandrich M; Del Forno S; Cooper N; Linton-Reid K; Landolfo C; Timmerman D; Saso S; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Dec; 64(6):808-817. PubMed ID: 38787921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules to Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Detection of Malignancy in Adnexal Cysts. Patel-Lippmann KK; Sadowski EA; Robbins JB; Paroder V; Barroilhet L; Maddox E; McMahon T; Sampene E; Wasnik AP; Blaty AD; Maturen KE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 31770022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital. Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery? Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups. Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology. Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Bourne T; Ajossa S; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Czekierdowski A; Savelli L; Van Huffel S; Valentin L; Timmerman D Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 18(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 22114135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective validation of the IOTA logistic regression models (LR1 and LR2) in comparison to subjective pattern recognition for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Nunes N; Ambler G; Hoo WL; Naftalin J; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1583-9. PubMed ID: 24088790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound reporting systems in evaluation of adnexal masses: A prospective observational study. Kapoor S; Singhal S; Dhamija E; Manchanda S; Malhotra N; Bhatla N Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Oct; 301():186-193. PubMed ID: 39153388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]