These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33626112)

  • 41. Strategies to diagnose ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3 of the multicentre international IOTA study.
    Testa A; Kaijser J; Wynants L; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Aug; 111(4):680-8. PubMed ID: 24937676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interobserver agreement in describing the ultrasound appearance of adnexal masses and in calculating the risk of malignancy using logistic regression models.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Feb; 21(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 25424853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
    Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surgical outcomes of adnexal masses classified by IOTA ultrasound simple rules.
    Carballo EV; Maturen KE; Li Z; Patel-Lippmann KK; Wasnik AP; Sadowski EA; Barroilhet LM
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21848. PubMed ID: 36528698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Association between the sonographer's experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules.
    Ning CP; Ji X; Wang HQ; Du XY; Niu HT; Fang SB
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 16(1):179. PubMed ID: 30185198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors.
    Guo Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M
    Ultrasonography; 2022 Jul; 41(3):511-518. PubMed ID: 35196832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.
    Daemen A; Valentin L; Fruscio R; Van Holsbeke C; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Ombelet W; Rossi A; Vergote I; Bourne T; De Moor B; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 20814878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
    Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. ADC-derived spatial features can accurately classify adnexal lesions.
    Fathi Kazerooni A; Nabil M; Haghighat Khah H; Alviri M; Heidari-Sooreshjaani M; Gity M; Malek M; Saligheh Rad H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 28901638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
    Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A multicenter prospective external validation of the diagnostic performance of IOTA simple descriptors and rules to characterize ovarian masses.
    Sayasneh A; Kaijser J; Preisler J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Guha S; Naji O; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Fotopoulou C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 23578539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass.
    Kaijser J; Van Gorp T; Van Hoorde K; Van Holsbeke C; Sayasneh A; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 23360924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Value of ultrasonographic detection of normal ovarian tissue in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses in pediatric patients.
    Stankovic ZB; Bjelica A; Djukic MK; Savic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 20069549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Recommended guidelines of diagnosis for women with an ovarian cyst or tumour].
    Fischerová D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2014 Dec; 79(6):477-86. PubMed ID: 25585556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
    J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
    Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.
    Kaijser J; Bourne T; Valentin L; Sayasneh A; Van Holsbeke C; Vergote I; Testa AC; Franchi D; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 23065859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.