214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33626225)
1. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Choi CH; Park SY; Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Kim JI
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205229. PubMed ID: 30286187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plan quality score to evaluate the dwell time deviation restricted inverse planning by simulated annealing and graphically optimized treatment plans for template based interstitial brachytherapy.
Mondal K; Muskaan ; Mourya A; Choudhary S; Mandal A; Singh A; Aggarwal LM
Cancer Radiother; 2023 May; 27(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 37088572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of the effects of dwell time deviation constraints on inverse planning simulated annealing optimized plans of intracavitary brachytherapy of cancer cervix.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK; Savita A; Aditi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(6):1370-1376. PubMed ID: 31898675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.
Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.
Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I
Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame.
Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.
Dewitt KD; Hsu IC; Speight J; Weinberg VK; Lessard E; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1270-4. PubMed ID: 16253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dose Distribution Optimization in Combined Intracavitary and Interstitial Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer].
Ozaki D; Miyazawa M; Habano Y; Kawashima M; Hoshino Y; Sutou T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 29681602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A detailed dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse plans in HDR intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Trnková P; Baltas D; Karabis A; Stock M; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Pötter R; Kirisits C
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2010 Dec; 2(4):163-170. PubMed ID: 27853479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of dosimetric and radiobiological models of IPSA and HIPO algorithms in combined intra-cavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Yan C; Wang X; Wen A; Luo J; Zhang S; Wang P; Li J
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2023 Jun; 15(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 37425198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
