These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33627303)

  • 1. Deadly serious: The United Nations, drugs, and capital punishment in the 1980s.
    Mostyn B
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Jun; 92():103167. PubMed ID: 33627303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Alternative facts': Public opinion surveys on the death penalty for drug offences in selected Asian countries.
    Girelli G
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Jun; 92():103155. PubMed ID: 33994308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Vietnam continues to impose the death penalty for drug offences: A narrative commentary.
    Luong HT
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Feb; 88():103043. PubMed ID: 33227639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An uphill battle: A case example of government policy and activist dissent on the death penalty for drug-related offences in Indonesia.
    Kramer E; Stoicescu C
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Jun; 92():103265. PubMed ID: 33962834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transnational social movement theory and the waning war on drugs: Case studies from UNGASS 2016.
    Mostyn B; Gibbon H
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Jan; 51():148-155. PubMed ID: 29273560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reprint of: Why Vietnam continues to impose the death penalty for drug offences: A narrative commentary.
    Luong HT
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Jun; 92():103132. PubMed ID: 34144774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State sanctioned killing in the name of drugs: Laws, practice and conflicting trends in Asia.
    Sander G
    Int J Drug Policy; 2021 Jun; 92():103266. PubMed ID: 33931298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: a basis for jus cogens prohibition of juvenile capital punishment in the United States.
    Walker NE
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(1):143-69. PubMed ID: 11241686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Royal College of Psychiatrists and the death penalty.
    Gunn J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 15281424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of Death Penalty Views in China: An Empirical Comparison Between College Students and Citizens.
    Jiang S; Hu M; Lambert EG
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Oct; 62(14):4714-4735. PubMed ID: 29611448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Their Own Words: A Qualitative Exploration of Last Statements of Capital Punishment Inmates in the State of Missouri, 1995-2011.
    Upton MA; Carwile TM; Brown KS
    Omega (Westport); 2017 Sep; 75(4):376-394. PubMed ID: 28792360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lethal drugs in capital punishment in USA: History, present, and future perspectives.
    Kas K; Yim R; Traore S; ElFadaly M; Lang L; Freeman RA; Parmar JR; Kharel MK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2016; 12(6):1026-1034. PubMed ID: 26723905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Penal measures for drug offences: perspectives from some Asian countries.
    Jayasuriya DC
    Bull Narc; 1984; 36(3):9-13. PubMed ID: 6570654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants.
    Shin H
    Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population policies in Southeast Asia and Australia: the international relevance of domestic affairs.
    Jones GW
    J Aust Popul Assoc; 1984; 1():109-20. PubMed ID: 12267174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining capital punishment support in an abolitionist country: the case of The Netherlands.
    Hessing DJ; de Keijser JW; Elffers H
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Dec; 27(6):605-22. PubMed ID: 14724959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Family experience and public support of the death penalty.
    Gelles RJ; Straus MA
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1975 Jul; 45(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 1180343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Murder and capital punishment: some further evidence.
    Bailey WC
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1975 Jul; 45(4):669-688. PubMed ID: 1180347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physicians and the death penalty.
    Rothman DJ
    J Law Policy; 1995; 4(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 11654617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.