These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33628215)

  • 1. A New Recognition Method for the Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields.
    Feng Y; Xiao W; Wu T; Zhang J; Xiang J; Guo H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():6645270. PubMed ID: 33628215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Human Auditory Evoked Fields with a Flexible Multi-Channel OPM-Based MEG System.
    Zhang X; Chang Y; Wang H; Zhang Y; Hu T; Feng XY; Zhang MK; Yao ZK; Chen CQ; Xu JY; Fu FY; Guo QQ; Zhu JB; Xie HQ; Yang XD
    J Integr Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 23(5):93. PubMed ID: 38812381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multivariate, spatiotemporal analysis of electromagnetic time-frequency data of recognition memory.
    Düzel E; Habib R; Schott B; Schoenfeld A; Lobaugh N; McIntosh AR; Scholz M; Heinze HJ
    Neuroimage; 2003 Feb; 18(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 12595175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEG language lateralization in partial epilepsy using dSPM of auditory event-related fields.
    Raghavan M; Li Z; Carlson C; Anderson CT; Stout J; Sabsevitz DS; Swanson SJ; Binder JR
    Epilepsy Behav; 2017 Aug; 73():247-255. PubMed ID: 28662463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG.
    David O; Kiebel SJ; Harrison LM; Mattout J; Kilner JM; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1255-72. PubMed ID: 16473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Somatosensory, auditory, and visual evoked magnetic fields in patients with brain diseases.
    Nakasato N; Yoshimoto T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Mar; 17(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 10831111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MEG and TMS combined with EEG for mapping alcohol effects.
    Kähkönen S
    Alcohol; 2005 Nov; 37(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 16713500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of language-specific brain activity using magnetoencephalography.
    Simos PG; Breier JI; Zouridakis G; Papanicolaou AC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Oct; 20(5):706-22. PubMed ID: 10079046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical Bayes evaluation of fused EEG-MEG source reconstruction: Application to auditory mismatch evoked responses.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117468. PubMed ID: 33075561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Averaging auditory evoked magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic responses: a critical discussion.
    König R; Matysiak A; Kordecki W; Sielużycki C; Zacharias N; Heil P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 41(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 25728181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetoencephalography of the newborn brain.
    Huotilainen M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 11(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 16979394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetoencephalography in Landau-Kleffner syndrome.
    Paetau R
    Epilepsia; 2009 Aug; 50 Suppl 7():51-4. PubMed ID: 19682052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source estimation of spontaneous MEG activity and auditory evoked responses in normal subjects during sleep.
    Iramina K; Ueno S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 8728422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory-evoked responses.
    Taulu S; Hari R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1524-34. PubMed ID: 18661502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses.
    Huotilainen M; Winkler I; Alho K; Escera C; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 9714379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive neural network classifier for decoding MEG signals.
    Zubarev I; Zetter R; Halme HL; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():425-434. PubMed ID: 31059799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparative Study on the Detection of Covert Attention in Event-Related EEG and MEG Signals to Control a BCI.
    Reichert C; Dürschmid S; Heinze HJ; Hinrichs H
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():575. PubMed ID: 29085279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients with absent brainstem responses due to auditory neuropathy with optic atrophy.
    Takata Y; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Kobayashi T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 22119798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the hippocampus in auditory processing studied by event-related electric potentials and magnetic fields in epilepsy patients before and after temporal lobectomy.
    Nishitani N; Ikeda A; Nagamine T; Honda M; Mikuni N; Taki W; Kimura J; Shibasaki H
    Brain; 1999 Apr; 122 ( Pt 4)():687-707. PubMed ID: 10219782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.