These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33628810)

  • 1. Patient Satisfaction with Implant-Supported Monolithic and Partially Veneered Zirconia Restorations.
    De Angelis P; Gasparini G; Rella E; De Angelis S; Grippaudo C; D'Addona A; Manicone PF
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6692939. PubMed ID: 33628810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up.
    Pontevedra P; Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4327-4335. PubMed ID: 35142924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Pjetursson BE; Fehmer V; Sailer I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 35230351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.
    Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
    Sadowsky SJ
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review.
    Kim W; Li XC; Bidra AS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 35929416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance and patient satisfaction obtained with tooth-supported ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures.
    Forrer FA; Schnider N; Brägger U; Yilmaz B; Hicklin SP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 31902533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of endodontic access cavity preparation on monolithic and ceramic veneered zirconia restorations.
    Grobecker-Karl T; Christian M; Karl M
    Quintessence Int; 2016; 47(9):725-9. PubMed ID: 27447000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
    Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five-year clinical performance of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns-a prospective observational study.
    Waldecker M; Behnisch R; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Apr; 66(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 34556602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.
    De Angelis P; Passarelli PC; Gasparini G; Boniello R; D'Amato G; De Angelis S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 31202552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
    Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
    J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Adaptation of Monolithic High-Translucency Versus Porcelain-Veneered Zirconia Crowns.
    Rayyan MR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(4):364-366. PubMed ID: 31283817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival and complications of monolithic ceramic for tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mazza LC; Lemos CAA; Pesqueira AA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):566-574. PubMed ID: 33745685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study of zirconia-based restorations: 3-year clinical results.
    Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Gernet W; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Naumann M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Sep; 41(8):631-637. PubMed ID: 20657851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.