These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33629367)

  • 1. Selecting the model for multiple imputation of missing data: Just use an IC!
    Noghrehchi F; Stoklosa J; Penev S; Warton DI
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(10):2467-2497. PubMed ID: 33629367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance Evaluation of Missing-Value Imputation Clustering Based on a Multivariate Gaussian Mixture Model.
    Xiao J; Xu Q; Wu C; Gao Y; Hua T; Xu C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161112. PubMed ID: 27552203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variable selection with incomplete covariate data.
    Claeskens G; Consentino F
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1062-9. PubMed ID: 18371121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model selection in occupancy models: Inference versus prediction.
    Stewart PS; Stephens PA; Hill RA; Whittingham MJ; Dawson W
    Ecology; 2023 Mar; 104(3):e3942. PubMed ID: 36477749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imputation methods to improve inference in SNP association studies.
    Dai JY; Ruczinski I; LeBlanc M; Kooperberg C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):690-702. PubMed ID: 16986162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SuperMICE: An Ensemble Machine Learning Approach to Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations.
    Laqueur HS; Shev AB; Kagawa RMC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 191(3):516-525. PubMed ID: 34788362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple imputation with sequential penalized regression.
    Zahid FM; Heumann C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1311-1327. PubMed ID: 29451087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information criteria for Firth's penalized partial likelihood approach in Cox regression models.
    Nagashima K; Sato Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3422-3436. PubMed ID: 28608396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical evaluation of scoring functions for Bayesian network model selection.
    Liu Z; Malone B; Yuan C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 15(Suppl 15):S14. PubMed ID: 23046392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latent class based multiple imputation approach for missing categorical data.
    Gebregziabher M; DeSantis SM
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2010 Nov; 140(11):3252-3262. PubMed ID: 30555206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple imputation of maritime search and rescue data at multiple missing patterns.
    Wang G; Ma M; Jiang L; Chen F; Xu L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252129. PubMed ID: 34143787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
    Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Missing-Data Handling Methods for Lifelogs-Based Wellness Index Estimation: Comparative Analysis With Panel Data.
    Kim KH; Kim KJ
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e20597. PubMed ID: 33331831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regression multiple imputation for missing data analysis.
    Yu L; Liu L; Peace KE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2647-2664. PubMed ID: 32131673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missing data imputation via the expectation-maximization algorithm can improve principal component analysis aimed at deriving biomarker profiles and dietary patterns.
    Malan L; Smuts CM; Baumgartner J; Ricci C
    Nutr Res; 2020 Mar; 75():67-76. PubMed ID: 32035304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical comparison of some missing data treatments in PLS-SEM.
    Amusa LB; Hossana T
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0297037. PubMed ID: 38241223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
    Vrieze SI
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of missing data imputation methods for human osteometric measurements.
    Pang J; Liu X
    Am J Biol Anthropol; 2023 Aug; 181(4):666-676. PubMed ID: 37259623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
    Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying reprioritization response shift in a stroke caregiver population: a comparison of missing data methods.
    Sajobi TT; Lix LM; Singh G; Lowerison M; Engbers J; Mayo NE
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Mar; 24(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 25344817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.