These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33630706)

  • 1. Critical Analysis: The Often-Missing Step in Conducting Literature Review Research.
    Dodgson JE
    J Hum Lact; 2021 Feb; 37(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 33630706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critical Analysis of Reliability and Validity in Literature Reviews.
    Chetwynd E
    J Hum Lact; 2022 Aug; 38(3):392-396. PubMed ID: 35796304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Easy guide to conducting a systematic review.
    Caldwell PH; Bennett T
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2020 Jun; 56(6):853-856. PubMed ID: 32364273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conducting Online Surveys.
    Ball HL
    J Hum Lact; 2019 Aug; 35(3):413-417. PubMed ID: 31084575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative Research Excellence: Study Design and Reliable and Valid Measurement of Variables.
    Duckett LJ
    J Hum Lact; 2021 Aug; 37(3):456-463. PubMed ID: 34107788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does breast feeding help protect against atopic disease? Biology, methodology, and a golden jubilee of controversy.
    Kramer MS
    J Pediatr; 1988 Feb; 112(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 3339499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breastfeeding studies: culture, biomedicine, and methodology.
    Beasley A
    J Hum Lact; 1991 Mar; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 2006977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infant feeding and allergy: a critical review.
    Obeid A
    Paediatr Nurs; 1996 Nov; 8(9):17-22. PubMed ID: 9052205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast feeding for pain in neonates.
    J Perioper Pract; 2007 Feb; 17(2):45. PubMed ID: 17319564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.
    Hoekstra F; Mrklas KJ; Khan M; McKay RC; Vis-Dunbar M; Sibley KM; Nguyen T; Graham ID; ; Gainforth HL
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 32450919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews.
    Martin GP; Jenkins DA; Bull L; Sisk R; Lin L; Hulme W; Wilson A; Wang W; Barrowman M; Sammut-Powell C; Pate A; Sperrin M; Peek N;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():191-197. PubMed ID: 32726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived Breastfeeding Support Assessment Tool (PBSAT): development and testing of psychometric properties with Pakistani urban working mothers.
    Hirani SA; Karmaliani R; Christie T; Parpio Y; Rafique G
    Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 23039941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast-feeding and return to fertility: clinical evidence from Pakistan, Philippines and Thailand.
    Kennedy KI
    Asia Pac Popul J; 1990 Mar; 5(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 12283348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.