These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3363133)

  • 1. Quantitative coronary arteriography: design and validation.
    Ratib OM; Mankovich NJ
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 3363133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification.
    LeFree MT; Simon SB; Mancini GB; Bates ER; Vogel RA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Mar; 23(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3372175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
    Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA
    Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
    Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
    J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quantitative coronary angiography: methodologic principles of a densitometric procedure].
    Sievert H; Bakim E; Kober G; Kaltenbach M
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Jan; 77(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 3363977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities.
    Reiber JH; van der Zwet PM; Koning G; von Land CD; van Meurs B; Gerbrands JJ; Buis B; van Voorthuisen AE
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Mar; 28(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8439993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and quantitation of coronary artery stenoses from digital subtraction angiograms compared with 35-millimeter film cineangiograms.
    Tobis J; Nalcioglu O; Iseri L; Johnston WD; Roeck W; Castleman E; Bauer B; Montelli S; Henry WL
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Sep; 54(6):489-96. PubMed ID: 6383001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses.
    Simons MA; Bastian BV; Bray BE; Dedrickson DR
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries.
    Di Mario C; Haase J; den Boer A; Reiber JH; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of coronary stenosis quantitation results from on-line digital and digitized cine film images.
    Skelton TN; Kisslo KB; Bashore TM
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 62(7):381-6. PubMed ID: 3046284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method.
    Katritsis D; Lythall DA; Anderson MH; Cooper IC; Webb-Peploe MW
    Am Heart J; 1988 Nov; 116(5 Pt 1):1181-7. PubMed ID: 2973213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry. An in vivo analysis.
    Simons MA; Muskett AD; Kruger RA; Klausner SC; Burton NA; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Feb; 23(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 3277924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms.
    Nichols AB; Gabrieli CF; Fenoglio JJ; Esser PD
    Circulation; 1984 Mar; 69(3):512-22. PubMed ID: 6692513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA.
    Molloi SY; Ersahin A; Roeck WW; Nalcioglu O
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Feb; 26(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 2055711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Videodensitometric analysis of coronary stenoses. In vivo geometric and physiologic validation in humans.
    Johnson MR; Skorton DJ; Ericksen EE; Fleagle SR; Wilson RF; Hiratzka LF; White CW; Marcus ML; Collins SM
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):891-8. PubMed ID: 3203991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries.
    Doriot PA; Dorsaz PA; Dorsaz L; Chatelain P; Rutishauser W
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Dec; 12(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 8993991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Fleming RM; Kirkeeide RL; Smalling RW; Gould KL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 18(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 1894868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II).
    Haase J; Escaned J; van Swijndregt EM; Ozaki Y; Gronenschild E; Slager CJ; Serruys PW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Oct; 30(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 8221861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE
    Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical considerations on the precision of assessing blood vessel diameter in cine coronary angiography.
    Sandor T; Spears JR
    Comput Biomed Res; 1985 Dec; 18(6):531-43. PubMed ID: 4075787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.