These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33631442)

  • 21. Reverse logistics system and recycling potential at a landfill: A case study from Kampala City.
    Kinobe JR; Gebresenbet G; Niwagaba CB; Vinnerås B
    Waste Manag; 2015 Aug; 42():82-92. PubMed ID: 25936554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The UK waste input-output table: Linking waste generation to the UK economy.
    Salemdeeb R; Al-Tabbaa A; Reynolds C
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 27443295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concept of sustainable waste management in the city of Zagreb: Towards the implementation of circular economy approach.
    Ribić B; Voća N; Ilakovac B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Feb; 67(2):241-259. PubMed ID: 27650014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Landfill taxes and Enhanced Waste Management: Combining valuable practices with respect to future waste streams.
    Hoogmartens R; Eyckmans J; Van Passel S
    Waste Manag; 2016 Sep; 55():345-54. PubMed ID: 27067099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making.
    Di Maria A; Eyckmans J; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():3-21. PubMed ID: 29398268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What waste management can learn from the traditional mining sector: Towards an integrated assessment and reporting of anthropogenic resources.
    Jakob L; Michal Š; Franz-Georg S; Margarida Q; Jiri H; Florian H; Valerio F; Johann F; Roberto B; Elza B; Anna B; Dominik B
    Waste Manag; 2020 Jul; 113():154-156. PubMed ID: 32531663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decomposition analysis of the waste generation and management in 30 European countries.
    Korica P; Cirman A; Žgajnar Gotvajn A
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 27705881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sustainable strategy for municipal solid waste disposal in Hong Kong: current practices and future perspectives.
    Jing R; Liu T; Tian X; Rezaei H; Yuan C; Qian J; Zhang Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Aug; 27(23):28670-28678. PubMed ID: 32424753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Environmental and resource burdens associated with world biofuel production out to 2050: footprint components from carbon emissions and land use to waste arisings and water consumption.
    Hammond GP; Li B
    Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2016 Sep; 8(5):894-908. PubMed ID: 27610203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Waste printed circuit board recycling techniques and product utilization.
    Hadi P; Xu M; Lin CS; Hui CW; McKay G
    J Hazard Mater; 2015; 283():234-43. PubMed ID: 25285997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Life cycle comparative assessment of pet bottle waste management options: A case study for the city of Bauru, Brazil.
    Martin EJP; Oliveira DSBL; Oliveira LSBL; Bezerra BS
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jan; 119():226-234. PubMed ID: 33075619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: The importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances.
    Merrild H; Larsen AW; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1009-18. PubMed ID: 22265239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Flows of engineered nanomaterials through the recycling process in Switzerland.
    Caballero-Guzman A; Sun T; Nowack B
    Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():33-43. PubMed ID: 25524750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving the carbon footprint of food and packaging waste management in a supermarket of the Italian retail sector.
    Marrucci L; Marchi M; Daddi T
    Waste Manag; 2020 Mar; 105():594-603. PubMed ID: 32199583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the economic and environmental sustainability of household food waste management in the UK: Current situation and future scenarios.
    Slorach PC; Jeswani HK; Cuéllar-Franca R; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 710():135580. PubMed ID: 31785911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Proposal of a dynamic model to evaluate public policies for the circular economy: Scenarios applied to the municipality of Curitiba.
    da Silva CL
    Waste Manag; 2018 Aug; 78():456-466. PubMed ID: 32559933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Calculating the pre-consumer waste footprint: A screening study of 10 selected products.
    Laurenti R; Moberg Å; Stenmarck Å
    Waste Manag Res; 2017 Jan; 35(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 27837187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park.
    Parkes O; Lettieri P; Bogle ID
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():157-66. PubMed ID: 25837786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A case-study of landfill minimization and material recovery via waste co-gasification in a new waste management scheme.
    Tanigaki N; Ishida Y; Osada M
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():137-46. PubMed ID: 25182227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current status of solid waste management in small island developing states: A review.
    Mohee R; Mauthoor S; Bundhoo ZM; Somaroo G; Soobhany N; Gunasee S
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():539-49. PubMed ID: 26116009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.