These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33631495)

  • 1. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation treatment of liver cancer employing monopolar needles: A comprehensive investigation on the efficacy of time-based switching.
    Yap S; Ooi EH; Foo JJ; Ooi ET
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104273. PubMed ID: 33631495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ex vivo experiment of saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar radiofrequency ablation with a perfused needle electrode: comparison with conventional monopolar and simultaneous monopolar modes.
    Lee JM; Kim SH; Han JK; Sohn KL; Choi BI
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 15789259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons between impedance-based and time-based switching bipolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of liver cancer.
    Yap S; Ooi EH; Foo JJ; Ooi ET
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jul; 134():104488. PubMed ID: 34020132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thermal and thermal damage responses during switching bipolar radiofrequency ablation employing bipolar needles: A computational study on the effects of different electrode configuration, input voltage and ablation duration.
    Cheong JKK; Ooi EH; Ooi ET
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Sep; 36(9):e3374. PubMed ID: 32519516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation technique using multiple, internally cooled electrodes and a multichannel generator: ex vivo and in vivo pilot study.
    Lee JM; Han JK; Kim HC; Choi YH; Kim SH; Choi JY; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Mar; 42(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 17287646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unidirectional ablation minimizes unwanted thermal damage and promotes better thermal ablation efficacy in time-based switching bipolar radiofrequency ablation.
    Ooi EH; Ooi ET
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104832. PubMed ID: 34508975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RF-ablation pattern shaping employing switching channels of dual bipolar needle electrodes: ex vivo results.
    Ziegle J; Audigier C; Krug J; Ali G; Kim Y; Boctor EM; Friebe M
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jun; 13(6):905-916. PubMed ID: 29679219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode: comparison with consecutive and switching monopolar modes in ex vivo bovine livers.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 23690705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiofrequency ablation with four electrodes as a building block for matrix radiofrequency ablation: Ex vivo liver experiments and finite element method modelling. Influence of electric and activation mode on coagulation size and geometry.
    Mulier S; Possebon R; Jiang Y; Jamart J; Wang C; Miao Y; Yu T; Jiang K; Feng Y; Marchal G; Michel L; Ni Y
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 33():145-157. PubMed ID: 32561081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A computational model to investigate the influence of electrode lengths on the single probe bipolar radiofrequency ablation of the liver.
    Cheong JKK; Yap S; Ooi ET; Ooi EH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():17-32. PubMed ID: 31200904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a dual-switching system and a separable clustered electrode: evaluation of the in vivo efficiency.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Hwang EJ; Hwang IP; Baek J; Han JK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 24643383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saline-enhanced hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a perfused-cooled electrode: comparison of dual probe bipolar mode with monopolar and single probe bipolar modes.
    Lee JM; Han JK; Kim SH; Lee JY; Kim DJ; Lee MW; Cho GG; Han CJ; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 15235237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative experimental study of the in-vitro efficiency of hypertonic saline-enhanced hepatic bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency ablation.
    Lee JM; Han JK; Kim SH; Sohn KL; Lee KH; Ah SK; Choi BI
    Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 14530645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation lesion areas and confluence: An ex vivo study and technical report.
    Wondra A; Gulhar S; Brestle MD; Chou J; Desai MJ
    Pain Pract; 2024 Mar; 24(3):489-501. PubMed ID: 38100248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Lee DH; Lee SM; Lee KB; Kim BR; Kim TH; Lee S; Han JK
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176350. PubMed ID: 28445542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Switching bipolar hepatic radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes: comparison with consecutive monopolar and switching monopolar modes.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Woo S; Hwang EJ; Hwang I; Choi W; Han JK; Choi BI
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 88(1050):20140468. PubMed ID: 25873479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency analysis of bipolar and multipolar radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo porcine kidney model using three-dimensional reconstruction of histologic section series.
    Neuhaus J; Blachut L; Rabenalt R; Stein T; König F; Wehner M; Liatsikos E; Stolzenburg JU
    J Endourol; 2011 May; 25(5):859-67. PubMed ID: 21476895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Efficacy and Therapeutic Outcome of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Real-World Setting, Compared with Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Conducted during the Same Period.
    Tanaka T; Takata K; Kunimoto H; Fukuda H; Yamauchi R; Tsuchiya N; Inomata S; Yokoyama K; Morihara D; Takeyama Y; Shakado S; Sakisaka S; Hirai F
    Oncology; 2020; 98(12):859-868. PubMed ID: 32799203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee SM; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 28246508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A numerical study on the no-touch bipolar radiofrequency ablation
    Yap S; Cheong JKK; Ooi EH; Liao IY; Foo JJ; Nair SR; Mohd Ali AF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2887-2890. PubMed ID: 31946494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.