These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33633142)

  • 1. Frame localisation optical projection tomography.
    Russell CT; Vallejo Ramirez PP; Rees E
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):4551. PubMed ID: 33633142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality in thoracic 4D cone-beam CT: a sensitivity analysis of respiratory signal, binning method, reconstruction algorithm, and projection angular spacing.
    Shieh CC; Kipritidis J; O'Brien RT; Kuncic Z; Keall PJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041912. PubMed ID: 24694143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total Variation-Based Reduction of Streak Artifacts, Ring Artifacts and Noise in 3D Reconstruction from Optical Projection Tomography.
    Michálek J
    Microsc Microanal; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1602-1615. PubMed ID: 26459139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accelerated Optical Projection Tomography Applied to In Vivo Imaging of Zebrafish.
    Correia T; Lockwood N; Kumar S; Yin J; Ramel MC; Andrews N; Katan M; Bugeon L; Dallman MJ; McGinty J; Frankel P; French PM; Arridge S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136213. PubMed ID: 26308086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. View-independent reconstruction algorithms for cone beam CT with general saddle trajectory.
    Yang H; Li M; Koizumi K; Kudo H
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3865-84. PubMed ID: 16861786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image resolution and deconvolution in optical tomography.
    van der Horst J; Kalkman J
    Opt Express; 2016 Oct; 24(21):24460-24472. PubMed ID: 27828174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image processing assisted algorithms for optical projection tomography.
    Cheddad A; Svensson C; Sharpe J; Georgsson F; Ahlgren U
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jan; 31(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21768046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-modality optical projection tomography reconstruction method from fewer views.
    Dou S; Liu J; Yang L
    J Biophotonics; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e201800407. PubMed ID: 30578626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new field-of-view autotracking method based on back-projected ray image cross-correlation for online tomography reconstruction.
    Tomonaga S; Baba M; Baba N
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2014 Nov; 63 Suppl 1():i23-i24. PubMed ID: 25359820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a cone angle weighted three-dimensional image reconstruction algorithm to reduce cone-beam artefacts.
    Gomi T; Koshida K; Miyati T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):398-406. PubMed ID: 17082329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct inversion algorithm for focal plane scanning optical projection tomography.
    Chan KG; Liebling M
    Biomed Opt Express; 2017 Nov; 8(11):5349-5358. PubMed ID: 29188125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronized multiartifact reduction with tomographic reconstruction (SMART-RECON): A statistical model based iterative image reconstruction method to eliminate limited-view artifacts and to mitigate the temporal-average artifacts in time-resolved CT.
    Chen GH; Li Y
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4698-707. PubMed ID: 26233197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mathematical model and iterative inversion for fluorescent optical projection tomography.
    Koljonen V; Koskela O; Montonen T; Rezaei A; Belay B; Figueiras E; Hyttinen J; Pursiainen S
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):045017. PubMed ID: 30630144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise-robust Mojette reconstruction using sparse-view CT projections.
    Jiang M; Qu Z; Sun Y
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):237-256. PubMed ID: 30562914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Point spread function based image reconstruction in optical projection tomography.
    Trull AK; van der Horst J; Palenstijn WJ; van Vliet LJ; van Leeuwen T; Kalkman J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7784-7797. PubMed ID: 28854154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of artefacts in optical projection tomography.
    Walls JR; Sled JG; Sharpe J; Henkelman RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4645-65. PubMed ID: 16177495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporation of an experimentally determined MTF for spatial frequency filtering and deconvolution during optical projection tomography reconstruction.
    Chen L; McGinty J; Taylor HB; Bugeon L; Lamb JR; Dallman MJ; French PM
    Opt Express; 2012 Mar; 20(7):7323-37. PubMed ID: 22453413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A compressed sensing-based iterative algorithm for CT reconstruction and its possible application to phase contrast imaging.
    Li X; Luo S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2011 Aug; 10():73. PubMed ID: 21849088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise spatial nonuniformity and the impact of statistical image reconstruction in CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Lauzier PT; Tang J; Speidel MA; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4079-92. PubMed ID: 22830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.