These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33633977)

  • 1. Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study.
    Brunbjerg ME; Jensen TB; Overgaard J; Christiansen P; Damsgaard TE
    Gland Surg; 2021 Jan; 10(1):207-218. PubMed ID: 33633977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture.
    Lynch MP; Chung MT; Rinker BD
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74 Suppl 4():S214-7. PubMed ID: 25389715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Capsular contracture in implant based breast reconstruction-the effect of porcine acellular dermal matrix.
    Lardi AM; Ho-Asjoe M; Junge K; Farhadi J
    Gland Surg; 2017 Feb; 6(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 28210552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [DIRECT TO IMPLANT IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION USING THE FASCIAL SYSTEM IN THE INFRAMAMMARY FOLD, WITHOUT THE USE OF ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX].
    Ofir H; Jaeger M; Nachum O; Harats M; Haik J; Tessone A
    Harefuah; 2020 Aug; 159(8):589-594. PubMed ID: 32852160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
    Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Forsberg CG; Kelly DA; Wood BC; Mastrangelo SL; DeFranzo AJ; Thompson JT; David LR; Marks MW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S116-20. PubMed ID: 24374398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Woo KJ; Park JW; Mun GH; Pyon JK; Jeon BJ; Bang SI
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 28509694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?
    Ibrahim AM; Koolen PG; Ganor O; Markarian MK; Tobias AM; Lee BT; Lin SJ; Mureau MA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 25894022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions.
    DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Farajzadeh M; Berlin NL; MacEachern MP; Rudkin GH; Da Lio AL; Cederna PS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):967e-974e. PubMed ID: 31764630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
    Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
    Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
    Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Examining the Role of Acellular Dermal Matrix Fenestrations.
    Mowlds DS; Salibian AA; Scholz T; Paydar KZ; Wirth GA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Oct; 136(4):629-635. PubMed ID: 26090760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.
    Hille-Betz U; Kniebusch N; Wojcinski S; Henseler H; Heyl V; Ohlinger R; Paepke S; Klapdor R; Krause-Bergmann B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 25300607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
    Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of Partial- Versus Full-Sling Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Head-to-Head Comparison.
    Lee KT; Eom Y; Mun GH; Bang SI; Jeon BJ; Pyon JK
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 42(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 29368031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.