These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33634860)

  • 1. Low positive predictive value of computed tomography screening for lung cancer irrespective of commonly employed definitions of target population.
    Krilaviciute A; Brenner H
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jul; 149(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 33634860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-dose CT screening among never-smokers with or without a family history of lung cancer in Taiwan: a prospective cohort study.
    Chang GC; Chiu CH; Yu CJ; Chang YC; Chang YH; Hsu KH; Wu YC; Chen CY; Hsu HH; Wu MT; Yang CT; Chong IW; Lin YC; Hsia TC; Lin MC; Su WC; Lin CB; Lee KY; Wei YF; Lan GY; Chan WP; Wang KL; Wu MH; Tsai HH; Chian CF; Lai RS; Shih JY; Wang CL; Hsu JS; Chen KC; Chen CK; Hsia JY; Peng CK; Tang EK; Hsu CL; Chou TY; Shen WC; Tsai YH; Tsai CM; Chen YM; Lee YC; Chen HY; Yu SL; Chen CJ; Wan YL; Hsiung CA; Yang PC;
    Lancet Respir Med; 2024 Feb; 12(2):141-152. PubMed ID: 38042167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Low-Dose Computerized Tomography in Lung Cancer Screening among Never-Smokers.
    Kang HR; Cho JY; Lee SH; Lee YJ; Park JS; Cho YJ; Yoon HI; Lee KW; Lee JH; Lee CT
    J Thorac Oncol; 2019 Mar; 14(3):436-444. PubMed ID: 30445189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mortality, survival and incidence rates in the ITALUNG randomised lung cancer screening trial.
    Paci E; Puliti D; Lopes Pegna A; Carrozzi L; Picozzi G; Falaschi F; Pistelli F; Aquilini F; Ocello C; Zappa M; Carozzi FM; Mascalchi M;
    Thorax; 2017 Sep; 72(9):825-831. PubMed ID: 28377492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Jonas DE; Reuland DS; Reddy SM; Nagle M; Clark SD; Weber RP; Enyioha C; Malo TL; Brenner AT; Armstrong C; Coker-Schwimmer M; Middleton JC; Voisin C; Harris RP
    JAMA; 2021 Mar; 325(10):971-987. PubMed ID: 33687468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Follow-up Results of the DANTE Trial, a Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography.
    Infante M; Cavuto S; Lutman FR; Passera E; Chiarenza M; Chiesa G; Brambilla G; Angeli E; Aranzulla G; Chiti A; Scorsetti M; Navarria P; Cavina R; Ciccarelli M; Roncalli M; Destro A; Bottoni E; Voulaz E; Errico V; Ferraroli G; Finocchiaro G; Toschi L; Santoro A; Alloisio M;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2015 May; 191(10):1166-75. PubMed ID: 25760561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of discrimination performance of 11 lung cancer risk models for predicting lung cancer in a prospective cohort of screening-age adults from Germany followed over 17 years.
    Bhardwaj M; Schöttker B; Holleczek B; Brenner H
    Lung Cancer; 2022 Dec; 174():83-90. PubMed ID: 36356492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening-Results from the randomized German LUSI trial.
    Becker N; Motsch E; Trotter A; Heussel CP; Dienemann H; Schnabel PA; Kauczor HU; Maldonado SG; Miller AB; Kaaks R; Delorme S
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 146(6):1503-1513. PubMed ID: 31162856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography.
    Sadate A; Occean BV; Beregi JP; Hamard A; Addala T; de Forges H; Fabbro-Peray P; Frandon J
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 134():107-114. PubMed ID: 32502939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-World Lung Cancer CT Screening Performance, Smoking Behavior, and Adherence to Recommendations: Lung-RADS Category and Smoking Status Predict Adherence.
    Barbosa EJM; Yang R; Hershman M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):919-926. PubMed ID: 32755178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HUNCHEST-II contributes to a shift to earlier-stage lung cancer detection: final results of a nationwide screening program.
    Kerpel-Fronius A; Megyesfalvi Z; Markóczy Z; Solymosi D; Csányi P; Tisza J; Kecskés A; Baranyi B; Csánky E; Dóka A; Gálffy G; Göcző K; Győry C; Horváth Z; Juhász T; Kállai Á; Kincses ZT; Király Z; Király-Incze E; Kostyál L; Kovács A; Kovács A; Kuczkó É; Makra Z; Maurovich Horvát P; Merth G; Moldoványi I; Müller V; Pápai-Székely Z; Papp D; Polgár C; Rózsa P; Sárosi V; Szalai Z; Székely A; Szuhács M; Tárnoki D; Tavaszi G; Turóczi-Kirizs R; Tóth L; Urbán L; Vaskó A; Vigh É; Dome B; Bogos K
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3462-3470. PubMed ID: 37921926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography.
    Grover H; King W; Bhattarai N; Moloney E; Sharp L; Fuller L
    Lung Cancer; 2022 Aug; 170():20-33. PubMed ID: 35700629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors Associated with a Positive Baseline Screening Exam Result in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Balekian AA; Tanner NT; Fisher JM; Silvestri GA; Gould MK
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1568-74. PubMed ID: 27387658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ten-year results of the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection trial demonstrate the safety and efficacy of biennial lung cancer screening.
    Pastorino U; Sverzellati N; Sestini S; Silva M; Sabia F; Boeri M; Cantarutti A; Sozzi G; Corrao G; Marchianò A
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Sep; 118():142-148. PubMed ID: 31336289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Plasma-Based Biomarker for Lung Cancer Screening in China.
    Zhao Z; Wang Y; Wu W; Yang Y; Du L; Dong H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2213634. PubMed ID: 35608858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience.
    Menezes RJ; Roberts HC; Paul NS; McGregor M; Chung TB; Patsios D; Weisbrod G; Herman S; Pereira A; McGregor A; Dong Z; Sitartchouk I; Boerner S; Tsao MS; Keshavjee S; Shepherd FA
    Lung Cancer; 2010 Feb; 67(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 19427055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender-specific outcomes of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer detection: A retrospective study in Chinese never-smoker population.
    Wang H; Xie J; Chen Y; Jin J; Zhang M; Tung T; Xu Y
    Cancer Med; 2024 Sep; 13(18):e70184. PubMed ID: 39342623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening values of carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment for lung cancer in combination with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk populations: Initial and 2-year screening outcomes.
    Triphuridet N; Vidhyarkorn S; Worakitsitisatorn A; Sricharunrat T; Teerayathanakul N; Auewarakul C; Chungklay N; Krongthong W; Luengingkasoot S; Sornsamdang G; Patumanond J; Sritipsukho P
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Aug; 122():243-248. PubMed ID: 30032839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.