944 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33635285)
1. What Is the Comparative Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP Skeletal Scintigraphy, and Whole-body MRI as a Staging Investigation to Detect Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma?
Aryal A; Kumar VS; Shamim SA; Gamanagatti S; Khan SA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 479(8):1768-1779. PubMed ID: 33635285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2.
Bosma SE; Vriens D; Gelderblom H; van de Sande MAJ; Dijkstra PDS; Bloem JL
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1735-1746. PubMed ID: 31016339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography, bone scan, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy as staging investigations in Ewing sarcoma.
Newman EN; Jones RL; Hawkins DS
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1113-7. PubMed ID: 23192939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is methylene diphosphonate bone scan necessary for initial staging of Ewing sarcoma if 18F-FDG PET/CT is performed?
Ulaner GA; Magnan H; Healey JH; Weber WA; Meyers PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):859-67. PubMed ID: 24660717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body bone scanning for imaging osteolytic bone metastases.
Zhang L; Chen L; Xie Q; Zhang Y; Cheng L; Li H; Wang J
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15():7. PubMed ID: 25885599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is (99m)Tc-MDP whole body bone scintigraphy adjuvant to (18)F-FDG-PET for the detection of skeletal metastases?
Sahin E; Zincirkeser S; Akcan AB; Elboga U
J BUON; 2014; 19(1):291-6. PubMed ID: 24659678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pilot prospective evaluation of 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, 18F NaF PET/CT, 18F FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Young P; Mittra E; Dick DW; Herfkens R; Gambhir SS
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 38(7):e290-6. PubMed ID: 23455520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 99mTc-methyl diphosphonate bone scintigraphy and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.
Lee I; Byun BH; Lim I; Kim BI; Kong CB; Song WS; Cho WH; Koh JS; Lim SM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(37):e12318. PubMed ID: 30212975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in head and neck tumors.
Al-Bulushi NK; Abouzied ME
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 26813992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positron emission tomography for staging of pediatric sarcoma patients: results of a prospective multicenter trial.
Völker T; Denecke T; Steffen I; Misch D; Schönberger S; Plotkin M; Ruf J; Furth C; Stöver B; Hautzel H; Henze G; Amthauer H
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Dec; 25(34):5435-41. PubMed ID: 18048826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective study evaluating the relative sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT for detecting skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma in comparison to multidetector CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, using an adaptive trial design.
Gerety EL; Lawrence EM; Wason J; Yan H; Hilborne S; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Shaw AS; Bird N; Fife K; Heard S; Lomas DJ; Matakidou A; Soloviev D; Eisen T; Gallagher FA
Ann Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2113-8. PubMed ID: 26202597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pediatric bone sarcoma: diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT versus conventional imaging for initial staging and follow-up.
Quartuccio N; Fox J; Kuk D; Wexler LH; Baldari S; Cistaro A; Schöder H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 25539251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Role of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Extrapulmonary Metastases in Osteosarcoma Staging and Restaging: A Pilot Study.
Karaarslan E; Alis D; Basar Y; Kumbasar B; Kalayci CB; Alpan B; Ozger H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 47(4):629-636. PubMed ID: 36944103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-body MRI vs bone scintigraphy in the staging of Ewing sarcoma of bone: a 12-year single-institution review.
Kalus S; Saifuddin A
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5700-5708. PubMed ID: 30915559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG-PET for detection of osseous metastases from malignant primary bone tumours: comparison with bone scintigraphy.
Franzius C; Sciuk J; Daldrup-Link HE; Jürgens H; Schober O
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Sep; 27(9):1305-11. PubMed ID: 11007511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
