These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33635349)

  • 1. Assessing pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: does mesh weight matter?
    Giugale LE; Hansbarger MM; Askew AL; Visco AG; Shepherd JP; Bradley MS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2195-2201. PubMed ID: 33635349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy.
    Thomas TN; Davidson ERW; Lampert EJ; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 32253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes following sacrocolpopexy using ultralight and lightweight mesh.
    Kulkarni M; Rolnik DL; Alexander J; McGannon F; Liu YA; Rosamilia A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2475-2483. PubMed ID: 35445355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomic Variation of Sacral Mesh Attachment During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Glass Clark S; Dang R; Bonnet S; Zyczynski HM; Giugale L
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Apr; 29(4):404-409. PubMed ID: 36331917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of prior prolapse repairs on surgical outcomes with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.
    Dubinskaya A; Bradley MS; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 32130464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic excision and re-attachment of sacrocolpopexy mesh.
    Malekzadeh M; Ramirez-Caban L; Hurtado E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3301-3303. PubMed ID: 34003310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Kenton K; Mueller ER; Tarney C; Bresee C; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 27403758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
    Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy with mesh placement targeted to affected compartment.
    Rusavy Z; Najib B; Abdelkhalek Y; Grinstein E; Gluck O; Deval B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():188-192. PubMed ID: 35364554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Mesh Weight Affect Time to Failure After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy?
    Askew AL; Visco AG; Weidner AC; Truong T; Siddiqui NY; Bradley MS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Sep; 26(9):536-540. PubMed ID: 30681427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prolapse Recurrence After Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Removal: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Sassani JC; Ross JH; Lopa S; Handzel RM; Bradley MS; Bonidie M
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 26(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 31990794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy mesh excision step-by-step.
    Mohr S; Imboden S; Mueller MD; Kuhn A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Aug; 34(8):1987-1989. PubMed ID: 36897370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.