128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33635738)
1. Marginal analysis of bivariate mixed responses with measurement error and misclassification.
Zhang Q; Yi GY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1155-1186. PubMed ID: 33635738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic association studies with bivariate mixed responses subject to measurement error and misclassification.
Zhang Q; Yi GY
Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(26):3700-3719. PubMed ID: 32914420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Generalized network structured models with mixed responses subject to measurement error and misclassification.
Zhang Q; Yi GY
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1073-1088. PubMed ID: 35032335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Causal inference with noisy data: Bias analysis and estimation approaches to simultaneously addressing missingness and misclassification in binary outcomes.
Shu D; Yi GY
Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):456-468. PubMed ID: 31802532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the effects of continuous and discrete covariate mismeasurement, with emphasis on the dichotomization of mismeasured predictors.
Gustafson P; Le Nhu D
Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 12495142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.
Keogh RH; Shaw PA; Gustafson P; Carroll RJ; Deffner V; Dodd KW; Küchenhoff H; Tooze JA; Wallace MP; Kipnis V; Freedman LS
Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(16):2197-2231. PubMed ID: 32246539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Causal inference with measurement error in outcomes: Bias analysis and estimation methods.
Shu D; Yi GY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2049-2068. PubMed ID: 29241426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.
Chen Y; Hong C; Ning Y; Su X
Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 26303591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Logistic regression with correlated measurement error and misclassification in covariates.
Cao Z; Wong MY; Cheng GH
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):789-805. PubMed ID: 36790894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A weighting method for simultaneous adjustment for confounding and joint exposure-outcome misclassifications.
Penning de Vries BB; van Smeden M; Groenwold RH
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):473-487. PubMed ID: 32998668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposure misclassification in propensity score-based time-to-event data analysis.
Yang Y; Wang M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1347-1357. PubMed ID: 33826453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing Generalized Estimating Equation and Linear Mixed Effects Model for Estimating Marginal Association with Bivariate Continuous Outcomes.
Li M; Kong X
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 30(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 35838059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misclassification in binary responses and effect on genome-wide association studies.
Rekaya R; Smith S; Hay el H; Aggrey SE
Poult Sci; 2013 Sep; 92(9):2535-40. PubMed ID: 23960139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for binary response.
Huang X; Tebbs JM
Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 18945265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An efficient and robust method for analyzing population pharmacokinetic data in genome-wide pharmacogenomic studies: a generalized estimating equation approach.
Nagashima K; Sato Y; Noma H; Hamada C
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4838-58. PubMed ID: 23852468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Raking and regression calibration: Methods to address bias from correlated covariate and time-to-event error.
Oh EJ; Shepherd BE; Lumley T; Shaw PA
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(3):631-649. PubMed ID: 33140432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved generalized raking estimators to address dependent covariate and failure-time outcome error.
Oh EJ; Shepherd BE; Lumley T; Shaw PA
Biom J; 2021 Jun; 63(5):1006-1027. PubMed ID: 33709462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
