120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33636799)
1. Impact of Integrating Rumke Statistics to Assist with Choosing Between Automated Hematology Analyzer Differentials vs Manual Differentials.
Stephens L; Hintz-Prunty W; Bengtsson HI; Proudfoot JA; Patel SP; Broome HE
J Appl Lab Med; 2017 Jan; 1(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 33636799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Different Small Clinical Hematology Laboratory Configurations With Focus on Remote Smear Imaging.
Stephens L; Bevins NJ; Bengtsson HI; Broome HE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Oct; 143(10):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 30969157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the absolute neutrophil count as a stand-alone test in a hematology/oncology clinic: an abbreviated test can be preferable.
Jatoi A; Jaromin R; Jennings L; Nguyen PL
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1998; 12(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 10185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow cytometric validation of automated differentials in pediatric patients.
Finn LS; Hall J; Xu M; Rutledge JC
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 15224768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of manual and automated leukocyte counts for determination of the absolute neutrophil count: application to a pediatric oncology clinic.
Parham DM; Ready R; Stine K; Quiggins C; Becton D; North P
Med Pediatr Oncol; 2002 Mar; 38(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 11836718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of automated counting to determine absolute neutrophil counts and absolute phagocyte counts for pediatric cancer treatment protocols.
Hijiya N; Onciu M; Howard SC; Zhang Z; Cheng C; Sandlund JT; Kyzer EP; Behm FG; Pui CH
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 101(11):2681-6. PubMed ID: 15517573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system.
Briggs C; Longair I; Slavik M; Thwaite K; Mills R; Thavaraja V; Foster A; Romanin D; Machin SJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Feb; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 18177438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absolute neutrophil counts from automated hematology instruments are accurate and precise even at very low levels.
Amundsen EK; Urdal P; Hagve TA; Holthe MR; Henriksson CE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 137(6):862-9. PubMed ID: 22586044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of automated synovial fluid total cell count and percent polymorphonuclear leukocytes on a Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer for identifying patients at risk of septic arthritis.
Saadalla A; Jara Aguirre J; Wockenfus AM; Kelley BR; Swanson RL; Howard MT; Karon BS
Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Nov; 510():416-420. PubMed ID: 32763227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.
Kim HN; Hur M; Kim H; Kim SW; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28672770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing automated vs manual leukocyte differential counts for quantifying the 'left shift' in the blood of neonates.
MacQueen BC; Christensen RD; Yoder BA; Henry E; Baer VL; Bennett ST; Yaish HM
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):843-8. PubMed ID: 27279079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of abnormal cells in white cell differentials: comparison of the HEMATRAK automated system with manual methods.
Rock WA; Miale JB; Johnson WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Feb; 81(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 6695859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation and implementation of an algorithm for reporting the automated absolute neutrophil count from selected flagged specimens.
Sireci AN; Herlitz L; Lee K; Bautista JL; Kratz A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Nov; 134(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 20959654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canine differential leukocyte counting with the CellaVision DM96Vision, Sysmex XT-2000iV, and Advia 2120 hematology analyzers and a manual method.
Tvedten HW; Lilliehöök IE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 40(3):324-39. PubMed ID: 21884185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Performance evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system in WBC differentials].
Yamamoto T; Tabe Y; Ishii K; Itoh S; Maeno I; Matsumoto K; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Sep; 58(9):884-90. PubMed ID: 20963948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.
Nam M; Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Kim H; Park M; Kim HN
Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 42(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 35177560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others).
Aulesa C; Mainar I; Prieto M; Cobos N; Galimany R
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 14649464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital image analysis of blood cells.
Da Costa L
Clin Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 35(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 25676375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
