These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33636996)

  • 21. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impacts of Victim Resistance and Type of Assault on Legal Decision-Making in Child Sexual Assault.
    Rawn KP; Levi MM; Pals AM; Huber H; Golding JM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2023 May; 32(4):418-437. PubMed ID: 36809071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
    Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual harassment stories: testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.
    Huntley JE; Costanzo M
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):29-51. PubMed ID: 12647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
    Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.
    Wuensch KL; Campbell MW; Kesler FC; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 142(5):587-600. PubMed ID: 12236469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
    Butler E; Jacquin K
    Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.
    Lynch KR; Wasarhaley NE; Golding JM; Simcic T
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(16):3205-22. PubMed ID: 23929601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case.
    Magyarics CL; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Lippert A
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):602-13. PubMed ID: 26237334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rape Perpetrators on Trial: The Effect of Sexual Assault-Related Schemas on Attributions of Blame.
    Stuart SM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
    J Interpers Violence; 2019 Jan; 34(2):310-336. PubMed ID: 27026408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
    Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial.
    Golding JM; Fryman HM; Marsil DF; Yozwiak JA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1311-21. PubMed ID: 14637304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes.
    Osborn K; Davis JP; Button S; Foster J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Mar; 36(5-6):NP2675-NP2696. PubMed ID: 29629635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?
    Culhane SE; Hosch HM; Weaver WG
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 15732651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mock juror perception of sexual assault nurse examiner testimony.
    Wasarhaley NE; Simcic TA; Golding JM
    Violence Vict; 2012; 27(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 22978071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.