342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33638109)
1. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical resection of T4 colon cancers: an NCDB propensity score-matched analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.
Parascandola SA; Horsey ML; Hota S; Sparks AD; Tampo MMT; Kim G; Obias V
J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):701-710. PubMed ID: 33104963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database.
Horsey ML; Sparks AD; Lai D; Herur-Raman A; Ng M; Obias V
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2739-2747. PubMed ID: 34536115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in utilization, conversion rates, and outcomes for minimally invasive approaches to non-metastatic rectal cancer: a national cancer database analysis.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Sparks AD; Boulos S; Cavallo K; Kim G; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3154-3165. PubMed ID: 32601761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
Midura EF; Hanseman DJ; Hoehn RS; Davis BR; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Paquette IM
Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 25999253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.
Emile SH; Horesh N; Freund MR; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Silva-Alvarenga E; Dasilva G; Wexner SD
Br J Surg; 2023 Jan; 110(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 36471483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis.
Ishihara S; Kiyomatsu T; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Kazama S; Sunami E; Nozawa H; Watanabe T
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 29687373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of short-term outcomes.
Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven NAW; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
Br J Surg; 2021 Nov; 108(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 34370834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
