160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33638664)
1. Factors Associated with Listing Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Smith-Hicks KN; Morrison ML
Environ Manage; 2021 Apr; 67(4):563-573. PubMed ID: 33638664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Haig SM; Beever EA; Chambers SM; Draheim HM; Dugger BD; Dunham S; Elliott-Smith E; Fontaine JB; Kesler DC; Knaus BJ; Lopes IF; Loschl P; Mullins TD; Sheffield LM
Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17181793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range.
Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attributes of preemptive conservation efforts for species precluded from listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Stanley AE; Epanchin-Niell R; Treakle T; Iacona GD
Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr; 38(2):e14200. PubMed ID: 37817673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expert judgment and uncertainty regarding the protection of imperiled species.
Heeren A; Karns G; Bruskotter J; Toman E; Wilson R; Szarek H
Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):657-665. PubMed ID: 27624752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving species status assessments under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and implications for multispecies conservation challenges worldwide.
Noss RF; Cartwright JM; Estes D; Witsell T; Elliott G; Adams D; Albrecht M; Boyles R; Comer P; Doffitt C; Faber-Langendoen D; Hill J; Hunter WC; Knapp WM; Marshall ME; Singhurst J; Tracey C; Walck J; Weakley A
Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1715-1724. PubMed ID: 34057264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Separating Proactive Conservation from Species Listing Decisions.
Kovach AI; Cheeseman AE; Cohen JB; Rittenhouse CD; Whipps CM
Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 70(5):710-729. PubMed ID: 36100759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with preemptive conservation under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Treakle T; Epanchin-Niell R; Iacona GD
Conserv Biol; 2023 Oct; 37(5):e14104. PubMed ID: 37185993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of standardized methods to improve extinction-risk classification.
Mothes CC; Clements SL; Hewavithana DK; Howell HJ; David AS; Leventhal ND; Searcy CA
Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):754-761. PubMed ID: 31584211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative tools for implementing the new definition of significant portion of the range in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Earl JE; Nicol S; Wiederholt R; Diffendorfer JE; Semmens D; Flockhart DTT; Mattsson BJ; McCracken G; Norris DR; Thogmartin WE; López-Hoffman L
Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 28574183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marine mammals and sea turtles listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act are recovering.
Valdivia A; Wolf S; Suckling K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210164. PubMed ID: 30650125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Climate change, marine environments, and the US Endangered species act.
Seney EE; Rowland MJ; Lowery RA; Griffis RB; McClure MM
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1138-46. PubMed ID: 24299080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
Himes Boor GK
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the impact of the U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery planning guidelines on managing threats for listed species.
Troyer CM; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1423-33. PubMed ID: 26108948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting recovery criteria for threatened and endangered plant species on the basis of past abundances and biological traits.
Neel MC; Che-Castaldo JP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 23293869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioeconomic analysis supports the endangered species act.
Salau KR; Fenichel EP
J Math Biol; 2015 Oct; 71(4):817-46. PubMed ID: 25312414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical habitat for threatened and endangered species: how should the economic costs be evaluated?
Plantinga AJ; Helvoigt TL; Walker K
J Environ Manage; 2014 Feb; 134():127-35. PubMed ID: 24473346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision-making for data-deficient species.
Fitzgerald DB; Smith DR; Culver DC; Feller D; Fong DW; Hajenga J; Niemiller ML; Nolfi DC; Orndorff WD; Douglas B; Maloney KO; Young JA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1627-1638. PubMed ID: 33471375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
