159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33638664)
21. Using expert knowledge to support Endangered Species Act decision-making for data-deficient species.
Fitzgerald DB; Smith DR; Culver DC; Feller D; Fong DW; Hajenga J; Niemiller ML; Nolfi DC; Orndorff WD; Douglas B; Maloney KO; Young JA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1627-1638. PubMed ID: 33471375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporating climate science in applications of the US endangered species act for aquatic species.
McClure MM; Alexander M; Borggaard D; Boughton D; Crozier L; Griffis R; Jorgensen JC; Lindley ST; Nye J; Rowland MJ; Seney EE; Snover A; Toole C; VAN Houtan K
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1222-33. PubMed ID: 24299088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 17002756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genetic data and the listing of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Fallon SM
Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1186-95. PubMed ID: 17883484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl.
Dunk JR; Woodbridge B; Schumaker N; Glenn EM; White B; LaPlante DW; Anthony RG; Davis RJ; Halupka K; Henson P; Marcot BG; Merola-Zwartjes M; Noon BR; Raphael MG; Caicco J; Hansen DL; Mazurek MJ; Thrailkill J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210643. PubMed ID: 30640947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Novel data show expert wildlife agencies are important to endangered species protection.
Evans MJ; Malcom JW; Li YW
Nat Commun; 2019 Aug; 10(1):3467. PubMed ID: 31371718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hybridization, agency discretion, and implementation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Lind-Riehl JF; Mayer AL; Wellstead AM; Gailing O
Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1288-1296. PubMed ID: 27113272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Same law, diverging practice: Comparative analysis of Endangered Species Act consultations by two federal agencies.
Evansen M; Li YW; Malcom J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230477. PubMed ID: 32196537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incorporating climate and ocean change into extinction risk assessments for 82 coral species.
Brainard RE; Weijerman M; Eakin CM; McElhany P; Miller MW; Patterson M; Piniak GA; Dunlap MJ; Birkeland C
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1169-78. PubMed ID: 24299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Resolving critical habitat designation failures: reconciling law, policy, and biology.
Hagen AN; Hodges KE
Conserv Biol; 2006 Apr; 20(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 16903101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. PROFILE: Impending Recovery of Kirtland's Warbler: Case Study in the Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act.
Solomon BD
Environ Manage; 1998 Jan; 22(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 9419281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment.
Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1297-1306. PubMed ID: 27030933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing recovery of spectacled eiders using a Bayesian decision analysis.
Dunham KD; Osnas EE; Frost CJ; Fischer JB; Grand JB
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253895. PubMed ID: 34197512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Protecting endangered species: do the main legislative tools work?
Gibbs KE; Currie DJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e35730. PubMed ID: 22567111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating effects of tidal power projects and climate change on threatened and endangered marine species and their food web.
Busch DS; Greene CM; Good TP
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1190-200. PubMed ID: 24299085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Threatened and endangered species: at what cost? The corps of engineers looks at expenditures and priorities.
Henderson JE; Smith JM
Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 39(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17106795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Species listing under Canada's Species at Risk Act.
Findlay CS; Elgie S; Giles B; Burr L
Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1609-17. PubMed ID: 19500120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trends in extinction risk for imperiled species in Canada.
Favaro B; Claar DC; Fox CH; Freshwater C; Holden JJ; Roberts A;
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113118. PubMed ID: 25401772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating the Contribution of North American Zoos and Aquariums to Endangered Species Recovery.
Che-Castaldo JP; Grow SA; Faust LJ
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):9789. PubMed ID: 29955071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Application of multiple-population viability analysis to evaluate species recovery alternatives.
Neville HM; Leasure DR; Dauwalter DC; Dunham JB; Bjork R; Fesenmyer KA; Chelgren ND; Peacock MM; Luce CH; Isaak DJ; Carranza LA; Sjoberg J; Wenger SJ
Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):482-493. PubMed ID: 31310350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
