These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33639794)

  • 1. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of listeners' working memory and noise on speech intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Lee Y; Sung JE; Sim H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Oct; 28(10):785-95. PubMed ID: 24712561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.
    Arehart K; Souza P; Kates J; Lunner T; Pedersen MS
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 25985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.
    Payton KL; Shrestha M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3818-27. PubMed ID: 24180791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Intelligibility for Target and Masker with Different Spectra.
    Leclère T; Théry D; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():257-266. PubMed ID: 27080666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening effort and speech intelligibility in listening situations affected by noise and reverberation.
    Rennies J; Schepker H; Holube I; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2642-53. PubMed ID: 25373965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Binaural Unmasking of Speech Using a Blind Binaural Processing Stage.
    Hauth CF; Berning SC; Kollmeier B; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520975630. PubMed ID: 33305690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual and Objective Assessment of Envelope Enhancement for Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Moshgelani F; Parsa V; Allan C; Veeranna SA; Allen P
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jan; 28(1):143-151. PubMed ID: 31804940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.