These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33639819)

  • 1. Palate shape influence depends on the segment: Articulatory and acoustic variability in American English /ɹ/ and /s/.
    Bakst S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):960. PubMed ID: 33639819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the effect of palate shape on the articulatory-acoustics mapping.
    Bakst S; Johnson K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):EL71. PubMed ID: 30075643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A modeling investigation of articulatory variability and acoustic stability during American English /r/ production.
    Nieto-Castanon A; Guenther FH; Perkell JS; Curtin HD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3196-212. PubMed ID: 15957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior.
    Brunner J; Fuchs S; Perrier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3936-49. PubMed ID: 19507976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production.
    Guenther FH; Espy-Wilson CY; Boyce SE; Matthies ML; Zandipour M; Perkell JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2854-65. PubMed ID: 10335635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interspeaker variability in hard palate morphology and vowel production.
    Lammert A; Proctor M; Narayanan S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1924-33. PubMed ID: 24687447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic acoustic-articulatory relations in back vowel fronting: Examining the effects of coda consonants in two dialects of British English.
    Gorman E; Kirkham S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):724. PubMed ID: 32872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Articulatory-acoustic kinematics: the production of American English /s/.
    Iskarous K; Shadle CH; Proctor MI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):944-54. PubMed ID: 21361451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in individual constriction contributions to third formant values in American English /ɹ/.
    Harper S; Goldstein L; Narayanan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3905. PubMed ID: 32611162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Articulatory tongue shape analysis of Mandarin alveolar-retroflex contrast.
    Luo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):1961. PubMed ID: 33138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vowel variability and contrast in Childhood Apraxia of Speech: acoustics and articulation.
    Lenoci G; Celata C; Ricci I; Chilosi A; Barone V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1011-1035. PubMed ID: 33322970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aspects of spatio-temporal variability during consonant production by Greek speakers with hearing impairment.
    Nicolaidis K
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Jun; 21(6):405-22. PubMed ID: 17516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Articulatory and acoustic adaptation to palatal perturbation.
    Thibeault M; Ménard L; Baum SR; Richard G; McFarland DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2112-20. PubMed ID: 21476667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Articulation and acoustics of Kannada affricates: A case of geminate /ʧ/.
    Kochetov A; Sreedevi N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(3-5):202-26. PubMed ID: 26403671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Palatal morphology can influence speaker-specific realizations of phonemic contrasts.
    Weirich M; Fuchs S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1894-908. PubMed ID: 24687445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphological and acoustic modeling of the vocal tract.
    Serrurier A; Neuschaefer-Rube C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Mar; 153(3):1867. PubMed ID: 37002095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporation of phonetic constraints in acoustic-to-articulatory inversion.
    Potard B; Laprie Y; Ouni S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2310-23. PubMed ID: 18397035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships Between Acoustic Characteristics and Intelligibility Scores: A Reanalysis of Japanese Speakers' Productions of American English Liquids.
    Aoyama K; Hong L; Flege JE; Akahane-Yamada R; Yamada T
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):1030-1045. PubMed ID: 36680472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic speech recognition using articulatory features from subject-independent acoustic-to-articulatory inversion.
    Ghosh PK; Narayanan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL251-7. PubMed ID: 21974500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Labiovelar compensation in back vowels.
    de Jong KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2221-33. PubMed ID: 9104024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.