279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33639827)
1. Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
O'Neill ER; Parke MN; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1224. PubMed ID: 33639827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
Richter ME; Chatterjee M
Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants.
Spitzer ER; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):475-486. PubMed ID: 32976249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gated Word Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Adults With Cochlear Implants: Influence of Semantic Context.
Patro C; Mendel LL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):145-158. PubMed ID: 29242894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semantic influences on the perception of degraded speech by individuals with cochlear implants.
Patro C; Mendel LL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1778. PubMed ID: 32237796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. More Than Words: the Relative Roles of Prosody and Semantics in the Perception of Emotions in Spoken Language by Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
Taitelbaum-Swead R; Icht M; Ben-David BM
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1378-1389. PubMed ID: 35030551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Emotional Prosody Identification by School-Age Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Peers With Normal Hearing.
Chatterjee M; Gajre S; Kulkarni AM; Barrett KC; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):411-424. PubMed ID: 37811966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-Analysis on the Identification of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Cochlear Implant Users and Vocoder Simulations.
Everhardt MK; Sarampalis A; Coler M; Başkent D; Lowie W
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32251011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
