260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33639926)
21. Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review.
Soll D; Guraiib MM; Rollins NC; Reis AA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32404063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of a multimedia-assisted informed consent procedure on the information gain, satisfaction, and anxiety of cataract surgery patients.
Tipotsch-Maca SM; Varsits RM; Ginzel C; Vecsei-Marlovits PV
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 26948785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.
Jimison HB; Sher PP; Appleyard R; LeVernois Y
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1998; 5(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 9609494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK
Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital informed consent for urological surgery - randomized controlled study comparing multimedia-supported vs. traditional paper-based informed consent concerning satisfaction, anxiety, information gain and time efficiency.
Haack M; Fischer ND; Frey L; Sparwasser P; Dotzauer R; Duwe G; Haferkamp A; Borgmann H
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37925488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
Montalvo W; Larson E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using a multimedia presentation to improve patient understanding and satisfaction with informed consent for minimally invasive vascular procedures.
Bowers N; Eisenberg E; Montbriand J; Jaskolka J; Roche-Nagle G
Surgeon; 2017 Feb; 15(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26464072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Video, App, and Standard Consent Processes on Decision-Making for Biospecimen Research: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rothwell E; Johnson E; Wong B; Goldenberg A; Tarini BA; Riches N; Stark LA; Pries C; Langbo C; Langen E; Botkin J
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):252-260. PubMed ID: 32242760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of Multimedia Teaching Tools in Parental Anxiety and Comprehension of Informed Consent Procedure in Pediatric Surgical Procedures: A Single Centre Randomized Control Trial.
Shreyas K; Jadhav A; Goel AD; Pathak M; Rathod K; Nayak S; Saxena R; Sinha A
J Pediatr Surg; 2023 Oct; 58(10):2000-2005. PubMed ID: 37217363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of a multimedia teaching tool on parental anxiety and knowledge during the informed consent process.
Paton EA; Davis SK; Gaylord N; Cao X; Gosain A
Pediatr Surg Int; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1345-1352. PubMed ID: 30255353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of multimedia during informed consent: novelty or necessity.
Chill HH; Dior U; Shveiky D
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1635-1637. PubMed ID: 31302718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using a Multimedia Presentation to Enhance Informed Consent in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
Spencer SP; Stoner MJ; Kelleher K; Cohen DM
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2015 Aug; 31(8):572-6. PubMed ID: 26221786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.
Cohen E; Byrom B; Becher A; Jörntén-Karlsson M; Mackenzie AK
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e43883. PubMed ID: 37656499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of multimedia interventions on the informed consent process for cataract surgery in rural South India.
Karan A; Somasundaram P; Michael H; Shayegani A; Mayer H
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 62(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 24008787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of e-consent in surgery and application to neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mirza AB; Khoja AK; Ali F; El-Sheikh M; Bibi-Shahid A; Trindade J; Rocos B; Grahovac G; Bull J; Montgomery A; Arvin B; Sadek AR
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Nov; 165(11):3149-3180. PubMed ID: 37695436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
Rees S; Williams A
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of multimedia consent programs for surgical procedures: a systematic review.
Nehme J; El-Khani U; Chow A; Hakky S; Ahmed AR; Purkayastha S
Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 22589017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial.
Simon CM; Klein DW; Schartz HA
Genet Med; 2016 Jan; 18(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 25834945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is there an impact of a video-based patient informed consent in elective hand surgery?
Osterloh J; Müller-Seubert W; Cai A; Arkudas A; Horch RRE
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jun; 144(6):2899-2903. PubMed ID: 38850419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multimedia patient education to assist the informed consent process for knee arthroscopy.
Cornoiu A; Beischer AD; Donnan L; Graves S; de Steiger R
ANZ J Surg; 2011 Mar; 81(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 21342392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
