157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33640238)
1. Value of pressure injury assessment scales for patients in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Zhuang Y; Shen J; Chen X; Wen Q; Jiang Q; Lao Y
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2021 Jun; 64():103009. PubMed ID: 33640238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
Fulbrook P; Anderson A
J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park SH; Lee HS
Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang C; Ma Y; Wang C; Jiang M; Yuet Foon L; Lv L; Han L
Nurs Open; 2021 Sep; 8(5):2194-2207. PubMed ID: 33630407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the accuracy of the CALCULATE scale for pressure injury in critically ill patients.
de Souza GKC; Kaiser DE; Morais PP; Boniatti MM
Aust Crit Care; 2023 Mar; 36(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 35232616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Manzotti C; Casazza G; Stimac T; Nikolova D; Gluud C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(7):CD012546. PubMed ID: 31283001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.
Theeranut A; Ninbanphot S; Limpawattana P
Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Jan; 26(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 32368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Delirium Assessment Tools in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ho MH; Montgomery A; Traynor V; Chang CC; Kuo KN; Chang HR; Chen KH
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2020 Aug; 17(4):301-310. PubMed ID: 32786067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis.
García-Fernández FP; Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Agreda JJ
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 24280770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
