178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33640736)
1. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating DNA evidence possibly involving multiple (mixed) samples, common donors and related contributors.
Kruijver M; Taylor D; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102532. PubMed ID: 34130043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paternity testing and other inference about relationships from DNA mixtures.
Green PJ; Mortera J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():128-137. PubMed ID: 28314238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedigree-based relationship inference from complex DNA mixtures.
Dørum G; Kaur N; Gysi M
Int J Legal Med; 2017 May; 131(3):629-641. PubMed ID: 28101646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deconvoluting multi-person biological mixtures and accurate characterization and identification of separated contributors using non-targeted single-cell DNA sequencing.
Kulhankova L; Bindels E; Kayser M; Mulugeta E
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103030. PubMed ID: 38513339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining evidence across multiple mixed DNA profiles for improved resolution of a donor when a common contributor can be assumed.
Taylor D; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102375. PubMed ID: 32937256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Yara Gambirasio case: Combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case.
Graversen T; Mortera J; Lago G
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():52-63. PubMed ID: 30776772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validating TrueAllele
Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
