These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33640738)

  • 1. Neural correlates of spontaneous deception in a non-competitive interpersonal scenario: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
    Lin XA; Wang C; Zhou J; Sai L; Fu G
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Jun; 150():105704. PubMed ID: 33640738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study.
    Ding XP; Gao X; Fu G; Lee K
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):704-12. PubMed ID: 23340482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.
    Yin L; Reuter M; Weber B
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Feb; 102():13-25. PubMed ID: 26685089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of second-order verbal deception: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
    Ding XP; Sai L; Fu G; Liu J; Lee K
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():505-14. PubMed ID: 24161626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preschoolers' deception related to prefrontal cortex activation: An fNIRS study.
    Dai M; Gao Y; Hu X; Fu G; Hu Z; Sai L
    Neuroimage; 2024 Sep; 298():120795. PubMed ID: 39153522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.
    Feng YJ; Hung SM; Hsieh PJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jul; 43(10):3257-3269. PubMed ID: 35344258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy to investigate hemodynamic responses to deception in the prefrontal cortex.
    Tian F; Sharma V; Kozel FA; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1303():120-30. PubMed ID: 19782657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender difference in spontaneous deception: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Liu T; Pelowski M; Yu D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7508. PubMed ID: 28790399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the preparation for deception and truth-telling.
    Ito A; Abe N; Fujii T; Hayashi A; Ueno A; Mugikura S; Takahashi S; Mori E
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1464():43-52. PubMed ID: 22580084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural alignment during face-to-face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?
    Chen M; Zhang T; Zhang R; Wang N; Yin Q; Li Y; Liu J; Liu T; Li X
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(17):4964-4981. PubMed ID: 32808714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of anterior prefrontal cortex (area 10) in face-to-face deception measured with fNIRS.
    Pinti P; Devoto A; Greenhalgh I; Tachtsidis I; Burgess PW; de C Hamilton AF
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 16(1-2):129-142. PubMed ID: 32577765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. fNIRS-based online deception decoding.
    Hu XS; Hong KS; Ge SS
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):026012. PubMed ID: 22337819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting concealed information using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
    Sai L; Zhou X; Ding XP; Fu G; Sang B
    Brain Topogr; 2014 Sep; 27(5):652-62. PubMed ID: 24514911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions.
    Abe N; Suzuki M; Mori E; Itoh M; Fujii T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 17280517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial neural network models: implementation of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based spontaneous lie detection in an interactive scenario.
    Bhutta MR; Ali MU; Zafar A; Kim KS; Byun JH; Lee SW
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2023; 17():1286664. PubMed ID: 38328471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.
    Phan KL; Magalhaes A; Ziemlewicz TJ; Fitzgerald DA; Green C; Smith W
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Feb; 12(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 15721593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Look Into the Power of fNIRS Signals by Using the Welch Power Spectral Estimate for Deception Detection.
    Zhang J; Zhang J; Ren H; Liu Q; Du Z; Wu L; Sai L; Yuan Z; Mo S; Lin X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():606238. PubMed ID: 33536888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional Interactions Between Neural Substrates of Socio-cognitive Mechanisms Involved in Simple Deception and Manipulative Truth.
    Zheltyakova M; Korotkov A; Cherednichenko D; Kireev M
    Brain Connect; 2022 Sep; 12(7):639-649. PubMed ID: 34470467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.
    Li F; Zhu H; Xu J; Gao Q; Guo H; Wu S; Li X; He S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():71. PubMed ID: 29593514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An EEG Dataset of Neural Signatures in a Competitive Two-Player Game Encouraging Deceptive Behavior.
    Chen Y; Fazli S; Wallraven C
    Sci Data; 2024 Apr; 11(1):389. PubMed ID: 38627400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.