155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33641046)
1. Evaluation of [
Weber M; Jentzen W; Hofferber R; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Conti M; Wetter A; Kersting D; Rischpler C; Fragoso Costa P
EJNMMI Res; 2021 Feb; 11(1):21. PubMed ID: 33641046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of
Weber M; Jentzen W; Hofferber R; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Umutlu L; Conti M; Costa PF; Sraieb M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33446147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of emission time for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT using the digital biograph vision: a phantom study.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; SÜßELBECK F; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Kersting D; Weber M
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 67(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 34309334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regularized reconstruction of digital time-of-flight
Lindström E; Velikyan I; Regula N; Alhuseinalkhudhur A; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
Theranostics; 2019; 9(12):3476-3484. PubMed ID: 31281491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image Quality and Activity Optimization in Oncologic
van Sluis J; Boellaard R; Dierckx RAJO; Stormezand GN; Glaudemans AWJM; Noordzij W
J Nucl Med; 2020 May; 61(5):764-771. PubMed ID: 31628214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined Early and Late [
Hohberg M; Kobe C; Täger P; Hammes J; Schmidt M; Dietlein F; Wild M; Heidenreich A; Drzezga A; Dietlein M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):558-566. PubMed ID: 30105521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Murthy V; Smith RL; Tao DH; Lawhn-Heath CA; Korenchan DE; Larson PEZ; Flavell RR; Hope TA
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Aug; 7(1):54. PubMed ID: 32844310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. (90)Y -PET imaging: Exploring limitations and accuracy under conditions of low counts and high random fraction.
Carlier T; Willowson KP; Fourkal E; Bailey DL; Doss M; Conti M
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4295-309. PubMed ID: 26133627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of
Lindström E; Lindsjö L; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jun; 7(1):40. PubMed ID: 32542512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing lesion detection efficacy and image quality across different PET system generations to optimize the iodine-124 PET protocol for recurrent thyroid cancer.
Kersting D; Jentzen W; Sraieb M; Costa PF; Conti M; Umutlu L; Antoch G; Nader M; Herrmann K; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Weber M
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 33587222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of PET acquisition durations on image quality and lesion detectability in whole-body
Noto B; Büther F; Auf der Springe K; Avramovic N; Heindel W; Schäfers M; Allkemper T; Stegger L
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):12. PubMed ID: 28168589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Translation and First In-Human Use of [
Eppard E; de la Fuente A; Benešová M; Khawar A; Bundschuh RA; Gärtner FC; Kreppel B; Kopka K; Essler M; Rösch F
Theranostics; 2017; 7(18):4359-4369. PubMed ID: 29158832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT.
Alberts I; Hünermund JN; Prenosil G; Mingels C; Bohn KP; Viscione M; Sari H; Vollnberg B; Shi K; Afshar-Oromieh A; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2395-2404. PubMed ID: 33797596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved [
Li L; Chen R; Wen J; Yang X; Hu D; Sun H; Ge Q; Ng YL; Zhou Y; Wan L; Chen Y; Wei W; Liu J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Aug; 13(8):5230-5241. PubMed ID: 37581091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The image quality and feasibility of solitary delayed [
Yu X; Xu L; Huang G; Liu J; Chen R; Chen Y
EJNMMI Res; 2024 Feb; 14(1):14. PubMed ID: 38319452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative performance and optimal regularization parameter in block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstructions in clinical
Ter Voert EEGW; Muehlematter UJ; Delso G; Pizzuto DA; Müller J; Nagel HW; Burger IA
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Jul; 8(1):70. PubMed ID: 30054750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of acquisition time and penalizing factor in a block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm on a Si-photomultiplier-based PET-CT system for
Trägårdh E; Minarik D; Almquist H; Bitzén U; Garpered S; Hvittfelt E; Olsson B; Oddstig J
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jul; 9(1):64. PubMed ID: 31342214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of injected
Wielaard J; Habraken JBA; Brinks P; Lavalaye J; Boellaard R
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Apr; 7(1):20. PubMed ID: 32297142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
