123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33641815)
21. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations.
Andriola FO; Haas Junior OL; Guijarro-Martínez R; Hernández-Alfaro F; Oliveira RB; Pagnoncelli RM; Swennen GR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Mar; 51(3):20210340. PubMed ID: 34520241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography nasopharyngeal volumetric and area measurements as determined by commercial software against nasopharyngoscopy-supported diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy.
Pachêco-Pereira C; Alsufyani N; Major M; Palomino-Gómez S; Pereira JR; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jul; 152(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 28651774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.
Eliliwi M; Bazina M; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 31549857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT.
Dusseldorp JK; Stamatakis HC; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):921-930. PubMed ID: 27206862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of the accuracy of imaging software for 3D rendering of the upper airway, usable in orthodontic and craniofacial clinical settings.
Lo Giudice A; Ronsivalle V; Gastaldi G; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2022 Jun; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 35691961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional mandibular superimposition techniques against Björk's structural superimposition method.
Franco CS; Sexton C; Flores-Mir C; Healey D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):e253-e273. PubMed ID: 33541785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study.
Heinz J; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 30342757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.
Ponce-Garcia C; Lagravere-Vich M; Cevidanes LHS; de Olivera Ruellas AC; Carey J; Flores-Mir C
Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):233-245. PubMed ID: 29189039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue thicknesses for craniofacial reconstruction using cone-beam CT images.
Hwang HS; Kim K; Moon DN; Kim JH; Wilkinson C
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 22150152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Upper Airway Prediction in Orthognathic Patients Using Dolphin Three-Dimensional Software.
Elshebiny T; Bous R; Withana T; Morcos S; Valiathan M
J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):1098-1100. PubMed ID: 32487834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study.
Short LJ; Khambay B; Ayoub A; Erolin C; Rynn C; Wilkinson C
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():147.e1-147.e8. PubMed ID: 24529418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the accuracy of voxel based registration and surface based registration for 3D assessment of surgical change following orthognathic surgery.
Almukhtar A; Ju X; Khambay B; McDonald J; Ayoub A
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93402. PubMed ID: 24695577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
