148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33642141)
1. Original study: The rescue staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with inadequate examined lymph nodes.
Fu N; Wang W; Cheng D; Wang J; Xu Z; Deng X; Peng C; Chen H; Shen B
Pancreatology; 2021 Jun; 21(4):724-730. PubMed ID: 33642141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Equipping the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Gastric Cancer with the 15-Node Minimum: a Population-Based Study Using Recursive Partitioning Analysis.
Yuan SQ; Chen YT; Huang ZP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Oct; 21(10):1591-1598. PubMed ID: 28752402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposal of a modified American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a lymph node ratio-based N classification: A retrospective cohort study.
Li HJ; Chen YT; Yuan SQ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(34):e12094. PubMed ID: 30142869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Value of the Number of Lymph Nodes Examined in Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
Yang ZL; Zhu MH; Shi Q; Lu FM; Wang CX
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Mar; 23(3):460-467. PubMed ID: 30225793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Novel Criterion for Lymph Nodes Dissection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population Study of the US SEER Database.
Wang W; Shen Z; Zhang J; Chen H; Deng X; Peng C; Xie J; Xu Z; Shen B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1533-1539. PubMed ID: 34622372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposed Modification of the 8th Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Shi S; Hua J; Liang C; Meng Q; Liang D; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):944-950. PubMed ID: 29334560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposal of the optimal numbers of examined and positive lymph nodes to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for 758 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Wu R; Zhang G; Feng J; Zhang L; Yang Z
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234464. PubMed ID: 32544187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Number of Positive Lymph Nodes Is Superior to LNR and LODDS for Predicting the Prognosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Gao B; Zhou D; Qian X; Jiang Y; Liu Z; Zhang W; Wang W
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():613755. PubMed ID: 33746899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Shin DW; Lee JC; Kim J; Woo SM; Lee WJ; Han SS; Park SJ; Choi KS; Cha HS; Yoon YS; Han HS; Hong EK; Hwang JH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2159-2165. PubMed ID: 31202572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Pu N; Yin L; Habib JR; Gao S; Hu H; Zhu Y; Wu Y; Yu J; Lou W
Future Oncol; 2019 Oct; 15(30):3457-3465. PubMed ID: 31460788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reassessment of the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Malleo G; Maggino L; Qadan M; Marchegiani G; Ferrone CR; Paiella S; Luchini C; Mino-Kenudson M; Capelli P; Scarpa A; Lillemoe KD; Bassi C; Castillo CF; Salvia R
Ann Surg; 2022 Nov; 276(5):e518-e526. PubMed ID: 33177357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph Node Metastatic Patterns and Survival Predictors Based on Tumor Size in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Pu N; Chen Q; Gan W; Shen Y; Gao S; Habib JR; Yin H; Zhang J; Kinny-Köster B; Cui M; Li J; Dong Y; Nagai M; Liu L; Yu J; Wu W; Lou W
Adv Ther; 2021 Aug; 38(8):4258-4270. PubMed ID: 34176089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?
Abdel-Rahman O
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Feb; 17(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29428107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis.
Chen YT; Huang ZP; Zhou ZW; He MM
Med Oncol; 2016 Nov; 33(11):122. PubMed ID: 27730526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic nomograms combining N classification with ratio-based nodal classifications to predict long-term survival for patients with lung adenocarcinoma after surgery: a SEER population-based study.
Wang S; Yu Y; Xu W; Lv X; Zhang Y; Liu M
BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):653. PubMed ID: 34344326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8
Chen HY; Wang X; Zhang H; Liu XB; Tan CL
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(46):6752-6766. PubMed ID: 31857777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining the optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer: An analysis using the nodal staging score model.
Hua J; Zhang B; Xu J; Liu J; Ni Q; He J; Zheng L; Yu X; Shi S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 30685327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.
Zheng ZJ; Wang MJ; Tan CL; Chen YH; Ping J; Liu XB
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(8):e19327. PubMed ID: 32080152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic accuracy of different lymph node staging system in predicting overall survival in stage IV colon cancer.
Han L; Mo S; Xiang W; Li Q; Wang R; Xu Y; Dai W; Cai G
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2020 Feb; 35(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 31858220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System Sufficiently Reasonable for All Patients with Noncardia Gastric Cancer? A 12,549-Patient International Database Study.
Lu J; Zheng ZF; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Li P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):2002-2011. PubMed ID: 29725896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
