148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33642141)
21. Number of Examined Lymph Nodes and Nodal Status Assessment in Distal Pancreatectomy for Body/Tail Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Malleo G; Maggino L; Ferrone CR; Marchegiani G; Mino-Kenudson M; Capelli P; Rusev B; Lillemoe KD; Bassi C; Fernàndez-Del Castillo C; Salvia R
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 29672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic impact of nodal statuses in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Fukuda Y; Asaoka T; Maeda S; Hama N; Miyamoto A; Mori M; Doki Y; Nakamori S
Pancreatology; 2017; 17(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 28122676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.
van Roessel S; Kasumova GG; Verheij J; Najarian RM; Maggino L; de Pastena M; Malleo G; Marchegiani G; Salvia R; Ng SC; de Geus SW; Lof S; Giovinazzo F; van Dam JL; Kent TS; Busch OR; van Eijck CH; Koerkamp BG; Abu Hilal M; Bassi C; Tseng JF; Besselink MG
JAMA Surg; 2018 Dec; 153(12):e183617. PubMed ID: 30285076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis.
Slidell MB; Chang DC; Cameron JL; Wolfgang C; Herman JM; Schulick RD; Choti MA; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):165-74. PubMed ID: 17896141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma.
Pu N; Gao S; Beckman R; Ding D; Wright M; Chen Z; Zhu Y; Hu H; Yin L; Beckman M; Thompson E; Hruban RH; Cameron JL; Gage MM; Lafaro KJ; Burns WR; Wolfgang CL; He J; Yu J; Burkhart RA
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Apr; 23(4):575-586. PubMed ID: 32900612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN.
Fan Z; Cheng H; Jin K; Gong Y; Huang Q; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X; Liu C; Luo G
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 31387646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modified American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System Based on the Node Ratio Can Further Improve the Capacity of Prognosis Assessment for Gastric Cancer Patients.
Yang ZL; Zhu MH; Han XJ; Liu QW; Long JH; Wang CX
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():329. PubMed ID: 31131256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Burns WR; Frankel TL; Cho CS; Nathan H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):2023-2030. PubMed ID: 28213792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exploration of the Exact Prognostic Significance of Lymphatic Metastasis in Jejunoileal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Chen L; Song Y; Zhang Y; Chen M; Chen J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):2067-2074. PubMed ID: 29748891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Refined Staging Model for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Incorporating Examined Lymph Nodes, Location of Tumor and Positive Lymph Nodes Ratio.
Song Y; Chen Z; Chen L; He C; Huang X; Duan F; Wang J; Lao X; Li S
J Cancer; 2018; 9(19):3507-3514. PubMed ID: 30310507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The number and ratio of positive lymph nodes affect pancreatic cancer patient survival after neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Fischer LK; Katz MH; Lee SM; Liu L; Wang H; Varadhachary GR; Wolff RA; Lee JE; Maitra A; Roland CL; Fleming JB; Estrella J; Rashid A; Wang H
Histopathology; 2016 Jan; 68(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 25945396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of examined lymph node count on prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma.
Li YF; Xiang YC; Zhang QQ; Wang WL
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2020 Aug; 11(4):644-653. PubMed ID: 32953148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.
Jiang W; Zhao B; Li Y; Qi D; Wang D
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1129. PubMed ID: 33225924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Revisiting Dukes' paradigm; some node positive colon cancer patients have better prognosis than some node negative patients.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Jun; 20(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 29086248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modified Gastric Cancer AJCC Staging with a Classification Based on the Ratio of Regional Lymph Node Involvement: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Huang Z; Chen Y; Zhang W; Liu H; Wang Z; Zhang Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 27(5):1480-1487. PubMed ID: 31776702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Rowan DJ; Hartley CP; Aldakkak M; Christians KK; Evans DB; Tsai S; Hagen CE
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jun; 46():151485. PubMed ID: 32172219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Number of positive nodes is superior to the lymph node ratio and American Joint Committee on Cancer N staging for the prognosis of surgically treated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
Roberts TJ; Colevas AD; Hara W; Holsinger FC; Oakley-Girvan I; Divi V
Cancer; 2016 May; 122(9):1388-97. PubMed ID: 26969807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Apr; 20(4):550-556. PubMed ID: 28808860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of Nodal Positivity in Inadequate Lymphadenectomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population Study Using the US SEER Database.
Wang W; Shen Z; Shi Y; Zou S; Fu N; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Deng X; Shen B
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1386. PubMed ID: 31867282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Features of T1 pancreatic cancer and validation of the eighth edition AJCC staging system definition using a Korean-Japanese joint cohort and the SEER database.
Kwon W; Heo JS; Han IW; Kang CM; Hwang HK; Kim SC; Park SJ; Yoon YS; Kim YH; Lim CS; Lee SY; Park T; Takami H; Watanabe N; Shimizu Y; Okuno M; Yamaue H; Kawai M; Seiko H; Nagakawa Y; Osakabe H; Sugiura T; Toyama H; Ohtsuka M; Unno M; Endo I; Kitago M; Jang JY
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Sep; 30(9):1129-1140. PubMed ID: 36734142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
