BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33642223)

  • 1. Which Prostate Biopsy in Men Enrolled in Active Surveillance? Experience in 110 Men Submitted to Scheduled Three-Years Transperineal Saturation Biopsy Combined With Fusion Targeted Cores.
    Pepe P; Pepe L; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Aug; 19(4):305-308. PubMed ID: 33642223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirmatory transperineal saturation prostate biopsy combined with mpMRI decrease the reclassification rate in men enrolled in Active Surveillance: Our experience in 100 men submitted to eight-years scheduled biopsy.
    Pepe P; Pepe L; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):270-273. PubMed ID: 36165468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection rate for significant cancer at confirmatory biopsy in men enrolled in Active Surveillance protocol: 20 cores vs 30 cores vs MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
    Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Barbera M; Panella P; Pennisi M; Morgia G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Dec; 88(4):300-303. PubMed ID: 28073197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance?
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1249-53. PubMed ID: 26699628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
    Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Pennisi M; Morgia G
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 28513296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT evaluation in men enrolled in prostate cancer Active Surveillance.
    Pepe P; Pepe L; Tamburo M; Marletta G; Savoca F; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 May; 95(2):11322. PubMed ID: 37212907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Many Cores Should be Obtained During Saturation Biopsy in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance? Experience in 875 Patients Submitted to Repeat Prostate Biopsy.
    Pepe P; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
    Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():133-137. PubMed ID: 31758981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
    Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
    Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiparametric MRI
    Pepe P; Dibenedetto G; Pepe L; Pennisi M
    In Vivo; 2020; 34(1):393-396. PubMed ID: 31882504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Could 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Evaluation Reduce the Number of Scheduled Prostate Biopsies in Men Enrolled in Active Surveillance Protocols?
    Pepe P; Roscigno M; Pepe L; Panella P; Tamburo M; Marletta G; Savoca F; Candiano G; Cosentino S; Ippolito M; Tsirgiotis A; Pennisi M
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 35743547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oncological Outcomes in Men With Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Enrolled in Active Surveillance.
    Pepe P; Pepe L; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
    In Vivo; 2024; 38(3):1300-1305. PubMed ID: 38688647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of microUltrasound at MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy in patients under active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Maffei D; Fasulo V; Avolio PP; Saitta C; Paciotti M; De Carne F; Colombo P; Pasini L; De Zorzi SZ; Saita A; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni GF; Casale P; Buffi NM; Lughezzani G
    Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(9):886-895. PubMed ID: 36960788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
    Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.