These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33642603)

  • 1. Evaluation of Matrix Band Systems for Posterior Proximal Restorations among Egyptian Dentists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Shaalan OO
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2020 Dec; 54(4):392-400. PubMed ID: 33642603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Matrix Systems on the Proximal Contact of Class II Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review.
    Alshardan R; Rozi A; AlSenan D; Rozi A; AlJohani B; Almusallam J; AlAteeq N
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50835. PubMed ID: 38259361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operators' Ease and Satisfaction in Restoring Class II Cavities With Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix System at Qassim University Dental Clinics.
    Almushayti M; Arjumand B
    Cureus; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e20957. PubMed ID: 35004091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison Between Two Types Of Matrix Systems For Contact Tightness In Class-Ii Composite Restorations.
    Asif M; Khattak I; Qureshi A; Zain M; Aslam N; Khan MI
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(2):253-258. PubMed ID: 37422816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of Class II restorations.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters JF; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Oct; 8(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 17080878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    ; Ahmad MZ; Gaikwad RN; Arjumand B
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):459-464. PubMed ID: 30127197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward a Clinically Reliable Class II Resin Composite Restoration: A Cross-Sectional Study into the Current Clinical Practice among Dentists in Saudi Arabia.
    AlSheikh R; Almulhim KS; Abdulkader M; Haridy R; Bugshan AS; Aldamanhouri R; Elgezawi M
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():2691376. PubMed ID: 35959095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of proximal contact tightness of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; Loomans BA; El Zohairy A; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20166409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Asscherickx K; Simon S; Abe Y; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 2001 Nov; 17(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 11567692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An
    Bhatia HP; Sood S; Sharma N; Singh A; Rajagopal V
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(6):748-751. PubMed ID: 35110865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
    Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
    J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal contact tightness of direct Class II composite resin restorations with various matrix systems: A systematic review.
    Anantula K; Vankayala B; Yadav SS
    J Conserv Dent Endod; 2024 Jan; 27(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 38389748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An
    Kumari S; Raghu R; Shetty A; Rajasekhara S; Padmini SD
    J Conserv Dent; 2023; 26(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 36908728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2006 Apr; 34(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 16157438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Kampouropoulos D; Paximada C; Loukidis M; Kakaboura A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 20672731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of approximal surfaces of posterior restorations in primary molars.
    Cerdán F; Ceballos L; Fuentes MV
    J Oral Sci; 2021 Oct; 63(4):347-351. PubMed ID: 34511588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do clinical experience time and postgraduate training influence the choice of materials for posterior restorations? Results of a survey with Brazilian general dentists.
    Nascimento GG; Correa MB; Opdam N; Demarco FF
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(6):642-6. PubMed ID: 24474363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.