These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33642707)

  • 21. Examining the causal relationship between bike-share and public transit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Kim M; Cho GH
    Cities; 2022 Dec; 131():104024. PubMed ID: 36211221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on user behaviors and environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big-data analysis.
    Shang WL; Chen J; Bi H; Sui Y; Chen Y; Yu H
    Appl Energy; 2021 Mar; 285():116429. PubMed ID: 33519037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatiotemporal evolving patterns of bike-share mobility networks and their associations with land-use conditions before and after the COVID-19 outbreak.
    Song J; Zhang L; Qin Z; Ramli MA
    Physica A; 2022 Apr; 592():126819. PubMed ID: 35002051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bike sharing usage prediction with deep learning: a survey.
    Jiang W
    Neural Comput Appl; 2022; 34(18):15369-15385. PubMed ID: 35702665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The motivations for using bike sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Lisbon.
    Teixeira JF; Silva C; Moura E Sá F
    Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2021 Oct; 82():378-399. PubMed ID: 34602849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Delayed effects of air pollution on public bike-sharing system use in Seoul, South Korea: A time series analysis.
    Yoo EH; Roberts JE; Suh Y
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jul; 352():117030. PubMed ID: 38852552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discovering spatiotemporal usage patterns of a bike-sharing system by type of pass: a case study from Seoul.
    Kim K
    Transportation (Amst); 2023 Feb; ():1-35. PubMed ID: 36846545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Planning for Bike Share Connectivity to Rail Transit.
    Griffin GP; Sener IN
    J Public Trans; 2016; 19(2):1-22. PubMed ID: 27872554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abstracting mobility flows from bike-sharing systems.
    Kon F; Ferreira ÉC; de Souza HA; Duarte F; Santi P; Ratti C
    Public Transp; 2022; 14(3):545-581. PubMed ID: 38624733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association of city-level walkability, accessibility to biking and public transportation and socio-economic features with COVID-19 infection in Massachusetts, USA: An ecological study.
    Wang Y; Tsai TC; Duncan D; Ji J
    Geospat Health; 2022 Jan; 17(s1):. PubMed ID: 35147011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bike-Sharing Demand Prediction at Community Level under COVID-19 Using Deep Learning.
    Mehdizadeh Dastjerdi A; Morency C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bike Share Usage and the Built Environment: A Review.
    Guo Y; Yang L; Chen Y
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():848169. PubMed ID: 35265580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the Multiscale Relationship between the Built Environment and the Metro-Oriented Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage.
    Li Z; Shang Y; Zhao G; Yang M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Travel patterns of free-floating e-bike-sharing users before and during COVID-19 pandemic.
    Choi SE; Kim J; Seo D
    Cities; 2023 Jan; 132():104065. PubMed ID: 36317088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expanding Bicycle-Sharing Systems: Lessons Learnt from an Analysis of Usage.
    Zhang Y; Thomas T; Brussel MJ; van Maarseveen MF
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168604. PubMed ID: 27977794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How did micro-mobility change in response to COVID-19 pandemic? A case study based on spatial-temporal-semantic analytics.
    Li A; Zhao P; Haitao H; Mansourian A; Axhausen KW
    Comput Environ Urban Syst; 2021 Nov; 90():101703. PubMed ID: 34629583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users' motivations during COVID-19.
    Teixeira JF; Silva C; Moura E Sá F
    Transp Policy (Oxf); 2022 Dec; 129():24-37. PubMed ID: 36246048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Did air pollution continue to affect bike share usage in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic?
    Hong J; McArthur DP; Sim J; Kim CH
    J Transp Health; 2022 Mar; 24():101342. PubMed ID: 35198380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Riding the wave: Predicting the use of the bike-sharing system in Barcelona before and during COVID-19.
    Bustamante X; Federo R; Fernández-I-Marin X
    Sustain Cities Soc; 2022 Aug; 83():103929. PubMed ID: 35535208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bike-Sharing Station Usage and the Surrounding Built Environments in Major Texas Cities.
    Alcorn LG; Jiao J
    J Plan Educ Res; 2023 Mar; 43(1):122-135. PubMed ID: 38736454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.