These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33643143)

  • 21. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sentence Context Prevails Over Word Association in Aphasia Patients with Spared Comprehension: Evidence from N400 Event-Related Potential.
    Khachatryan E; De Letter M; Vanhoof G; Goeleven A; Van Hulle MM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():684. PubMed ID: 28119590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quasi-compositional mapping from form to meaning: a neural network-based approach to capturing neural responses during human language comprehension.
    Rabovsky M; McClelland JL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Feb; 375(1791):20190313. PubMed ID: 31840583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The P600 as a continuous index of integration effort.
    Aurnhammer C; Delogu F; Brouwer H; Crocker MW
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Sep; 60(9):e14302. PubMed ID: 37042061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Structural Parsers and Neural Language Models as Surprisal Estimators.
    Oh BD; Clark C; Schuler W
    Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():777963. PubMed ID: 35310956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Salience and Attention in Surprisal-Based Accounts of Language Processing.
    Zarcone A; van Schijndel M; Vogels J; Demberg V
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():844. PubMed ID: 27375525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.
    Henderson JM; Choi W; Lowder MW; Ferreira F
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():293-300. PubMed ID: 26908322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension.
    Frank SL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):475-94. PubMed ID: 23681508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.
    Rajkumar R; van Schijndel M; White M; Schuler W
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():204-232. PubMed ID: 27428810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.
    Shain C; Blank IA; Fedorenko E; Gibson E; Schuler W
    J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 42(39):7412-7430. PubMed ID: 36002263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A time and place for language comprehension: mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network.
    Brouwer H; Hoeks JC
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():758. PubMed ID: 24273505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individual differences in verbal working memory underlie a tradeoff between semantic and structural processing difficulty during language comprehension: An ERP investigation.
    Kim AE; Oines L; Miyake A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):406-420. PubMed ID: 28933902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
    Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semantic processing in children with cochlear implants: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Bell N; Angwin AJ; Arnott WL; Wilson WJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Aug; 41(6):576-590. PubMed ID: 30919737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating information-theoretic measures of word prediction in naturalistic sentence reading.
    Aurnhammer C; Frank SL
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107198. PubMed ID: 31553896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.
    Van Petten C; Luka BJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):176-90. PubMed ID: 22019481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.