BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33644804)

  • 1. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
    Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
    Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
    Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
    Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
    Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
    Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese.
    Sousa B
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2013; 25(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23917975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients.
    Kim E; Choi M; Lee J; Kim YA
    Healthc Inform Res; 2013 Dec; 19(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 24523990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
    Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
    Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparative study on the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales].
    Lee YH; Jeong IS; Jeon SS
    Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2003 Apr; 33(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 15314444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
    Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
    Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.
    Theeranut A; Ninbanphot S; Limpawattana P
    Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Jan; 26(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 32368844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
    Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of pressure injury assessment scales for patients in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Zhuang Y; Shen J; Chen X; Wen Q; Jiang Q; Lao Y
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2021 Jun; 64():103009. PubMed ID: 33640238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based prevention of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit.
    Cooper KL
    Crit Care Nurse; 2013 Dec; 33(6):57-66. PubMed ID: 24293556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers in Critical Care Patients.
    Deng X; Yu T; Hu A
    Crit Care Nurse; 2017 Aug; 37(4):e1-e11. PubMed ID: 28765361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive validity of the EVARUCI scale to evaluate risk for pressure injury in critical care patients.
    de Souza MFC; Zanei SSV; Whitaker IY
    J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(Sup8):clxi-clxv. PubMed ID: 37561701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care patients.
    Serpa LF; Santos VL; Campanili TC; Queiroz M
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2011; 19(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21412629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.