These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33644804)

  • 21. Predictive validity of the EVARUCI scale to evaluate risk for pressure injury in critical care patients.
    de Souza MFC; Zanei SSV; Whitaker IY
    J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(Sup8):clxi-clxv. PubMed ID: 37561701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care patients.
    Serpa LF; Santos VL; Campanili TC; Queiroz M
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2011; 19(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21412629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.
    Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SIRA+P: Development and Testing.
    Foster KL; Bergerhofer LD; Smith JB; Fix MM; Olney A; Sherman A
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2017; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28094094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
    Lima-Serrano M; González-Méndez MI; Martín-Castaño C; Alonso-Araujo I; Lima-Rodríguez JS
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 28215408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incidence of pressure ulcers in a neurologic intensive care unit.
    Fife C; Otto G; Capsuto EG; Brandt K; Lyssy K; Murphy K; Short C
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 11246307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.
    Defloor T; Grypdonck MF
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Mar; 14(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 15707448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Park SH; Lee HS
    Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.
    Roca-Biosca A; Rubio-Rico L; Fernández MIM; Grau NG; Garijo GT; Fernández FPG
    J Wound Care; 2017 Sep; 26(9):528-536. PubMed ID: 28880761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.
    Bergstrom N; Braden B; Kemp M; Champagne M; Ruby E
    Nurs Res; 1998; 47(5):261-9. PubMed ID: 9766454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pressure Injury Risk Assessment in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Prospective Validation Study of the Glamorgan Scale and Predictive Comparison with the Braden Q Scale.
    Vocci MC; Amante Miot H; Mendes Bertoncello Fontes C; Fernandes Abbade LP
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2023 Mar; 36(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 36806282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.
    Sardo P; Simões C; Alvarelhão J; Costa C; Simões CJ; Figueira J; Simões JL; Amado F; Amaro A; Melo E
    J Clin Nurs; 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3165-76. PubMed ID: 26316350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis.
    García-Fernández FP; Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Agreda JJ
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 24280770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of the accuracy of the CALCULATE scale for pressure injury in critically ill patients.
    de Souza GKC; Kaiser DE; Morais PP; Boniatti MM
    Aust Crit Care; 2023 Mar; 36(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 35232616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in the ICU. Is it time for a more objective measure?
    McEvoy NL; Patton D; Curley GF; Moore Z
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103681. PubMed ID: 38518456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records.
    Jin Y; Piao J; Lee SM
    Res Nurs Health; 2015 Apr; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 25556557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
    Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.