BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33645277)

  • 1. A single centre evaluation of risk prediction models and imaging modalities in acute appendicitis.
    Ashcroft J; Singh AA; Rooney S; Bennett J; Davies RJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2021 Mar; 103(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 33645277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative appendicectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and Alvarado score.
    Kundiona I; Chihaka OB; Muguti GI
    Cent Afr J Med; 2015; 61(9-12):66-73. PubMed ID: 29144064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management and outcomes of appendicular neuroendocrine tumours: Retrospective review with 5-year follow-up.
    Amr B; Froghi F; Edmond M; Haq K; Thengungal Kochupapy R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1243-6. PubMed ID: 26188371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preoperative computed tomography is poor in detecting tumors of the appendix among patients with acute appendicitis: A cohort study of 5,224 appendectomies.
    Kangaspunta H; Tahkola K; Wirta EV; Kotaluoto S; Laukkarinen J; Ukkonen M
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2020 Mar; 88(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 32107355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Unacceptable Morbidity of Negative Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.
    Allaway MGR; Eslick GD; Cox MR
    World J Surg; 2019 Feb; 43(2):405-414. PubMed ID: 30209573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Relevance of the Nonvisualized Appendix on Ultrasonography of the Abdomen in Children.
    Nah SA; Ong SS; Lim WX; Amuddhu SK; Tang PH; Low Y
    J Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 182():164-169.e1. PubMed ID: 28010937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.
    Lee SL; Walsh AJ; Ho HS
    Arch Surg; 2001 May; 136(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 11343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dilemma of mucosal appendicitis: a clinico-pathological entity? A retrospective cohort study.
    Mizumoto R; Cristaudo AT; Lai NK; Premaratne G; Hendahewa R
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Apr; 88(4):E284-E288. PubMed ID: 27806437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging of suspected appendicitis.
    D'Souza N; Marsden M; Bottomley S; Nagarajah N; Scutt F; Toh S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Jan; 100(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 29046077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective use of CT by surgeons in acute appendicitis diagnosis.
    Fersahoğlu MM; Çiyiltepe H; Ergin A; Fersahoğlu AT; Esen Bulut N; Başak A; Karip B; Ağca B
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33394463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morbidity after negative appendectomy: a single-centre experience on 627 cases.
    Tamini N; Santurro L; Chiappetta MF; Gattuso I; Barbieri C; Fattori L; Gianotti L
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2020 Aug; 46(4):859-864. PubMed ID: 31041486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cohort study of 1241 patients to identify predictors of negative appendicectomy.
    Mackay TG; Dissanayake B; Yuide PJ; Burstow MJ; Gundara JS; Chua TC
    ANZ J Surg; 2020 Oct; 90(10):1984-1990. PubMed ID: 32808480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased CT scan utilization does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis in children.
    Partrick DA; Janik JE; Janik JS; Bensard DD; Karrer FM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 May; 38(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 12720164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
    Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative measurement of elasticity of the appendix using shear wave elastography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
    Cha SW; Kim IY; Kim YW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101292. PubMed ID: 25051242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stratified computed tomography findings improve diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis.
    Park G; Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(38):13942-9. PubMed ID: 25320531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation.
    Kosloske AM; Love CL; Rohrer JE; Goldthorn JF; Lacey SR
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14702443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
    Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.
    Garcia Peña BM; Cook EF; Mandl KD
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):24-8. PubMed ID: 14702442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute appendicitis--a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy.
    Borgstein PJ; Gordijn RV; Eijsbouts QA; Cuesta MA
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Sep; 11(9):923-7. PubMed ID: 9294274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.