These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33647374)
1. The effect of scanned area on the accuracy and time of anterior single implant scans: An in vitro study. Yilmaz B; Rizzo Marques V; Guo X; Gouveia D; Abou-Ayash S J Dent; 2021 Jun; 109():103620. PubMed ID: 33647374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Scanned Area and Operator on the Accuracy of Dentate Arch Scans with a Single Implant. Marques VR; Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Abou-Ayash S; Donmez MB; Yilmaz B J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of single implant scans with a healing abutment-scanpeg system compared with the scans of a scanbody and conventional impressions: An in vitro study. Yilmaz B; Gouveia D; Marques VR; Diker E; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103684. PubMed ID: 33961938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of implant location and operator on the accuracy of implant scans using a combined healing abutment-scan body system. Atalay S; Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103855. PubMed ID: 34688778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment-scan body system depending on the scan pattern and implant location: An in-vitro study. Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104169. PubMed ID: 35661761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans. Mizumoto RM; Alp G; Özcan M; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):987-994. PubMed ID: 31347253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32643259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study. Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of scan pattern on the scan accuracy of a combined healing abutment scan body system. Yilmaz H; Arınç H; Çakmak G; Atalay S; Donmez MB; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 35219530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Sallorenzo A; Agustín-Panadero R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104307. PubMed ID: 36162637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of coded healing abutment height and position on the trueness of digital intraoral implant scans. Batak B; Yilmaz B; Shah K; Rathi R; Schimmel M; Lang L J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):466-472. PubMed ID: 31542216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions. Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]