These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33647374)
21. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions. Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body. Donmez MB; Güven ME; Yılmaz D; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104716. PubMed ID: 37739057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Müller P; Ender A; Joda T; Katsoulis J Quintessence Int; 2016 Apr; 47(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 26824085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sources of error in maximum intercuspation from complete dentate full-arch intraoral scans in vitro. Osnes C; Wu J; Ferrari M; Joda T; Keeling A Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Sep; 24(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 34553893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data. Oh KC; Park JM; Moon HS J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):518-523. PubMed ID: 32133690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of novel prefabricated auxiliary devices attaching to scan bodies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of complete-arch with multiple implants: An in-vitro study. Wu HK; Wang J; Chen G; Huang X; Deng F; Li Y J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104702. PubMed ID: 37714453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of a specially designed geometric device and modified scan bodies on the accuracy of a maxillary complete arch digital implant scan: An in vitro study. Anwar H; Azer A; AboElHassan RG J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):683.e1-683.e7. PubMed ID: 38472074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation. Pan Y; Tam JM; Tsoi JK; Lam WY; Huang R; Chen Z; Pow EH J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103476. PubMed ID: 32961260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study. Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans. Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan. Park GH; Son K; Lee KB J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting. Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature]. Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of age, training, intraoral scanner, and software version on the scan accuracy of inexperienced operators. Zarauz C; Pradíes GJ; Chebib N; Dönmez MB; Karasan D; Sailer I J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):135-141. PubMed ID: 37837217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]