These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3364811)
1. [Comparison of etomidate and thiopental for the anesthesia in cardioversion]. Dellinger A; Marchand A; Zoheir F; Kirkorian G; Touboul P Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1988; 7(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 3364811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of etomidate and thiopental anesthesia for cardioversion. Ford SR; Maze M; Gaba DM J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1991 Dec; 5(6):563-5. PubMed ID: 1768819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Etomidate versus propofol for anesthesia in ambulatory cardioversion]. Kick O; Böhrer H; Motsch J; Kessler J; Conradi R; Martin E Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1996 Jun; 31(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 8767241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anaesthesia for cardioversion--clinical experiences with propofol and thiopentone. Sternlo JE; Hägerdal M Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1991 Oct; 35(7):606-8. PubMed ID: 1785238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Adverse effects reported after inductive doses of the intravenous anesthetics, thiopentone, etomidate and propofol]. Djordjević B; Stojiljković MP; Loncar-Stojiljković D; Krivokapić D; Adamov A Vojnosanit Pregl; 1999; 56(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 10437419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of combining thiopentone and etomidate for the induction of anaesthesia. Slater RM; Pollard BJ; Young TM; Hunt LP Postgrad Med J; 1990 Jul; 66(777):539-42. PubMed ID: 2217010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anaesthesia for laparoscopy. A comparison of five techniques including propofol, etomidate, thiopentone and isoflurane. de Grood PM; Harbers JB; van Egmond J; Crul JF Anaesthesia; 1987 Aug; 42(8):815-23. PubMed ID: 2959168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Etomidate and thiopental inhibit platelet function in patients undergoing infrainguinal vascular surgery. Gries A; Weis S; Herr A; Graf BM; Seelos R; Martin E; Böhrer H Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2001 Apr; 45(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 11300383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vecuronium induced bradycardia following induction of anaesthesia with etomidate or thiopentone, with or without fentanyl. Inoue K; el-Banayosy A; Stolarski L; Reichelt W Br J Anaesth; 1988 Jan; 60(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 2892519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Etomidate for induction of anaesthesia at caesarean section: comparison with thiopentone. Downing JW; Buley RJ; Brock-Utne JG; Houlton PC Br J Anaesth; 1979 Feb; 51(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 426990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anaesthesia for evacuation of retained products of conception. Comparison between alfentanil plus etomidate and fentanyl plus thiopentone. Kestin IG; Dorje P Br J Anaesth; 1987 Mar; 59(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 3103663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anesthesia for elective cardioversion: a comparison of four anesthetic agents. Canessa R; Lema G; Urzúa J; Dagnino J; Concha M J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1991 Dec; 5(6):566-8. PubMed ID: 1768820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaesthesia for cardioversion. A comparison between propofol, thiopentone and midazolam. Gupta A; Lennmarken C; Vegfors M; Tydén H Anaesthesia; 1990 Oct; 45(10):872-5. PubMed ID: 2240506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction and recovery characteristics of propofol, thiopental and etomidate. Boysen K; Sanchez R; Krintel JJ; Hansen M; Haar PM; Dyrberg V Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1989 Nov; 33(8):689-92. PubMed ID: 2589002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Etomidate versus thiopental for induction of anesthesia. Giese JL; Stockham RJ; Stanley TH; Pace NL; Nelissen RH Anesth Analg; 1985 Sep; 64(9):871-6. PubMed ID: 4025853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a comparison of propofol and thiopentone. Valtonen M; Kanto J; Klossner J Can J Anaesth; 1988 Sep; 35(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 3048754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anaesthetic induction for caesarean section with etomidate compared with thiopentone. Houlton PJ; Downing JW; Buley RJ; Brock-Utne JG S Afr Med J; 1978 Nov; 54(19):773-5. PubMed ID: 741308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recovery characteristics following induction of anaesthesia with a combination of thiopentone and propofol. Rashiq S; Gallant B; Grace M; Jolly DT Can J Anaesth; 1994 Dec; 41(12):1166-71. PubMed ID: 7867110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which intravenous induction agent for day surgery? A comparison of propofol, thiopentone, methohexitone and etomidate. Heath PJ; Kennedy DJ; Ogg TW; Dunling C; Gilks WR Anaesthesia; 1988 May; 43(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 3261140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone as induction agents for laparoscopy. Boey WK; Kumar A Singapore Med J; 1991 Apr; 32(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 1828309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]