155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33648790)
1. Re: Vinayak G. Wagaskar, Ankur Mittal, Stanislaw Sobotka, et al. Hood Technique for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy-Preserving Periurethral Anatomical Structures in the Space of Retzius and Sparing the Pouch of Douglas, Enabling Early Return of Continence Without Compromising Surgical Margin Rates. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.044.
Grivas N; Dell'Oglio P; De Groote R; Turri F; Mamoulakis C; Larcher A;
Eur Urol; 2021 May; 79(5):e152-e153. PubMed ID: 33648790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hood Technique for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy-Preserving Periurethral Anatomical Structures in the Space of Retzius and Sparing the Pouch of Douglas, Enabling Early Return of Continence Without Compromising Surgical Margin Rates.
Wagaskar VG; Mittal A; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Lantz A; Falagario UG; Martini A; Dovey Z; Treacy PJ; Pathak P; Nair S; Roy B; Chakravarty D; Lewis S; Haines K; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol; 2021 Aug; 80(2):213-221. PubMed ID: 33067016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Carlo A. Bravi, Marco Paciotti, Eleonora Balestrazzi, et al. Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo RAS Surgical System: Initial Experience at a High-volume Robotic Center. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.008.
Sarchi L; Sighinolfi MC; Assumma S; Calcagnile T; Grasso A; Sangalli M; Turri F; dell'Orto P; Rocco B
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Sep; 9(5):844-845. PubMed ID: 36906482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Bernardo Rocco, Luca Sarchi, Simone Assumma, et al. Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.021.
Dinneen E; Oxley J; Shaw G;
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):e120-e121. PubMed ID: 34489141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reply to Luca Sarchi, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Simone Assumma, et al.'s Letter to Editor re: Carlo A. Bravi, Marco Paciotti, Eleonora Balestrazzi, et al. Outcomes of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo RAS Surgical System: Initial Experience at a High-volume Robotic Center. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.008.
Bravi CA; Mottrie A
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Sep; 9(5):843. PubMed ID: 36898944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reply to Jinna Yao, Henry C.C. Pleass, and Howard M.H. Lau's Letter to the Editor re: Andrea Gallioli, Angelo Territo, Romain Boissier, et al. Learning Curve in Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Results from the European Robotic Urological Society Working Group. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.008.
Gallioli A; Territo A; Breda A
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):e166-e167. PubMed ID: 32291108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Dries Develtere, Giuseppe Rosiello, Pietro Piazza, et al. Early Catheter Removal on Postoperative Day 2 After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Updated Real-life Experience with the Aalst Technique. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.003.
Montorsi F; Gandaglia G; Dehò F; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Briganti A
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1861. PubMed ID: 35153172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Andrea Gallioli, Angelo Territo, Romain Boissier, et al. Learning Curve in Robotic-assisted Kidney Transplantation: Results from the European Robotic Urological Society Working Group. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.008.
Yao J; Pleass HCC; Lau HMH
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):e165. PubMed ID: 32312545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: K.R. Seetharam Bhat, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Marco Sandri, et al. Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.005.
Montorsi F; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Briganti A
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1868. PubMed ID: 35190294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Timothy J. Wilt, Tien N. Vo, Lisa Langsetmo, et al. Radical Prostatectomy or Observation for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Extended Follow-up of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.009.
van den Bergh RCN; Valerio M; Tilki D; Gandaglia G;
Eur Urol; 2020 Aug; 78(2):e67-e68. PubMed ID: 32303383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Abhishek Srivastava, Shahrokh F. Shariat, et al. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22,393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018.
Giannarini G; Suardi N; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):e89-90. PubMed ID: 24447574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reply to Eoin Dinneen, Jon Oxley, and Greg Shaw's Letter to the Editor re: Bernardo Rocco, Luca Sarchi, Simone Assumma, et al. Digital Frozen Sections with Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.03.021.
Rocco B; Cimadamore A; Sighinolfi MC; Assumma S; Montironi R
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):e122-e123. PubMed ID: 34483006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: Baojun Wang, Qingbo Huang, Kan Liu, et al. Robot-assisted Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Initial Series with Step-by-step Procedures and 1-yr Outcomes. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.019: Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy and Tumor Thrombectomy: Is It Exclusively the Approach that Matters?
González J; Ciancio G
Eur Urol; 2020 Mar; 77(3):e72-e73. PubMed ID: 31543364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: K.R. Seetharam Bhat, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Marco Sandri, et al. Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.005: Salvage Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrence After Focal Therapy-The Truth and Consequences.
Patel V; Bhat KRS; Moschovas MC; Noel J; Rogers T
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1864. PubMed ID: 35219650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Federico Dehò, Elio Mazzone, Armando Stabile, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: Dries Develtere, Giuseppe Rosiello, Pietro Piazza, et al. Early Catheter Removal on Postoperative Day 2 After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Updated Real-life Experience with the Aalst Technique. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.003.
Develtere D; Bravi CA; Mottrie A
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1862-1863. PubMed ID: 35315318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reply to Gianluca Giannarini, Nazareno Suardi and Alberto Briganti's letter to the editor re: Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Abhishek Srivastava, Shahrokh F. Shariat, et al. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22 393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018.
Sooriakumaran P; Wiklund P; Roobol MJ; Steyerberg E; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X; Tewari AK
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):e91-2. PubMed ID: 24447573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Zhiwen Chen, Peng He, Xiaozhou Zhou, et al. Preliminary Functional Outcome Following Robotic Intracorporeal Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder Suspension with Round Ligaments in Women with Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.012.
Hung SF; Yii SC; Chung SD
Eur Urol; 2022 May; 81(5):e118. PubMed ID: 35151516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: Bara Barakat, Hazem Othman, Ulrich Gauger, Ingmar Wolff, Boris Hadaschik, Christian Rehme. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003.
Kalampokis N; Grivas N; Karavitakis M; Leotsakos I; Katafigiotis I; van der Poel H
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Sep; 8(5):1554-1555. PubMed ID: 34930714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.
Chang KD; Abdel Raheem A; Choi YD; Chung BH; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 29645348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: Jean F.P. Lestingi, Giuliano B. Guglielmetti, Quoc-Dien Trinh, et al. Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.040: Time for a Change? Clinically Meaningful Reasons Why We Will Continue Performing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Selected Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Briganti A; Gandaglia G; Graefen M; Joniau S; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2021 May; 79(5):e154-e156. PubMed ID: 33637367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
