These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33650636)

  • 1. Proteo-chemometrics interaction fingerprints of protein-ligand complexes predict binding affinity.
    Wang DD; Xie H; Yan H
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(17):2570-2579. PubMed ID: 33650636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a protein-ligand extended connectivity (PLEC) fingerprint and its application for binding affinity predictions.
    Wójcikowski M; Kukiełka M; Stepniewska-Dziubinska MM; Siedlecki P
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 35(8):1334-1341. PubMed ID: 30202917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure-based protein-ligand interaction fingerprints for binding affinity prediction.
    Wang DD; Chan MT; Yan H
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():6291-6300. PubMed ID: 34900139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extended connectivity interaction features: improving binding affinity prediction through chemical description.
    Sánchez-Cruz N; Medina-Franco JL; Mestres J; Barril X
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 37(10):1376-1382. PubMed ID: 33226061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the information content of structural and protein-ligand interaction representations for the classification of kinase inhibitor binding modes via machine learning and active learning.
    Rodríguez-Pérez R; Miljković F; Bajorath J
    J Cheminform; 2020 May; 12(1):36. PubMed ID: 33431025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning from the ligand: using ligand-based features to improve binding affinity prediction.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 36(3):758-764. PubMed ID: 31598630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction based on profiles of intermolecular contacts.
    Wang DD; Chan MT
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2022; 20():1088-1096. PubMed ID: 35317230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural networks prediction of the protein-ligand binding affinity with circular fingerprints.
    Yin Z; Song W; Li B; Wang F; Xie L; Xu X
    Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(S1):487-495. PubMed ID: 37066944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 scoring exercise.
    Sulea T; Cui Q; Purisima EO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2066-81. PubMed ID: 21714553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interacting with GPCRs: Using Interaction Fingerprints for Virtual Screening.
    Lenselink EB; Jespers W; van Vlijmen HW; IJzerman AP; van Westen GJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Oct; 56(10):2053-2060. PubMed ID: 27626908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life beyond the Tanimoto coefficient: similarity measures for interaction fingerprints.
    Rácz A; Bajusz D; Héberger K
    J Cheminform; 2018 Oct; 10(1):48. PubMed ID: 30288626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SMPLIP-Score: predicting ligand binding affinity from simple and interpretable on-the-fly interaction fingerprint pattern descriptors.
    Kumar S; Kim MH
    J Cheminform; 2021 Mar; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 33766140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine-Learning- and Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Incorporating Ligand and Protein Fingerprints.
    Fujimoto KJ; Minami S; Yanai T
    ACS Omega; 2022 Jun; 7(22):19030-19039. PubMed ID: 35694525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction exploiting sequence constituent homology.
    Abdel-Rehim A; Orhobor O; Hang L; Ni H; King RD
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Aug; 39(8):. PubMed ID: 37572302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precise modelling and interpretation of bioactivities of ligands targeting G protein-coupled receptors.
    Wu J; Liu B; Chan WKB; Wu W; Pang T; Hu H; Yan S; Ke X; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):i324-i332. PubMed ID: 31510691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of cross-docked poses on performance of machine learning classifier for protein-ligand binding pose prediction.
    Shen C; Hu X; Gao J; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang Z; Xu L; Kang Y; Cao D; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2021 Oct; 13(1):81. PubMed ID: 34656169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ET-score: Improving Protein-ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance-weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm.
    Rayka M; Karimi-Jafari MH; Firouzi R
    Mol Inform; 2021 Aug; 40(8):e2060084. PubMed ID: 34021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BgN-Score and BsN-Score: bagging and boosting based ensemble neural networks scoring functions for accurate binding affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S8. PubMed ID: 25734685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sfcnn: a novel scoring function based on 3D convolutional neural network for accurate and stable protein-ligand affinity prediction.
    Wang Y; Wei Z; Xi L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):222. PubMed ID: 35676617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.
    Ballester PJ; Mitchell JB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1169-75. PubMed ID: 20236947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.