237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33650841)
1. Osteoporosis guidelines from a rehabilitation perspective: systematic analysis and quality appraisal using AGREE II.
Iolascon G; de Sire A; Curci C; Paoletta M; Liguori S; Calafiore D; Gimigliano F; Moretti A
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Apr; 57(2):273-279. PubMed ID: 33650841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines with physical activity recommendations for people diagnosed with cancer: A systematic critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool.
Shallwani SM; King J; Thomas R; Thevenot O; De Angelis G; Aburub AS; Brosseau L
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214846. PubMed ID: 30969981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assessment of osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines for physical activity and safe movement: an AGREE II appraisal.
Armstrong JJ; Rodrigues IB; Wasiuta T; MacDermid JC
Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():6. PubMed ID: 26759266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines.
Hayawi LM; Graham ID; Tugwell P; Yousef Abdelrazeq S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208251. PubMed ID: 30521556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Zeng M; Yi Q; Zeng L; Chen Z; Mi X; Song H; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang Q; Zhao R; Miao L; Zhang L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():47-58. PubMed ID: 31678686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic critical review of physical activity aspects in clinical guidelines for multiple sclerosis.
Geidl W; Gobster C; Streber R; Pfeifer K
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Oct; 25():200-207. PubMed ID: 30103172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A critical appraisal of the North American Spine Society guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Yaman ME; Gudeloglu A; Senturk S; Yaman ND; Tolunay T; Ozturk Y; Arslan AK
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 25614152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An overview of clinical guidelines for the management of vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review.
Parreira PCS; Maher CG; Megale RZ; March L; Ferreira ML
Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1932-1938. PubMed ID: 28739478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Overview Study of AGREE II Appraisals.
Dijkers MP; Ward I; Annaswamy T; Dedrick D; Feldpausch J; Moul A; Hoffecker L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 101(9):1643-1655. PubMed ID: 32437691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological Quality Appraisal of 27 Korean Guidelines Using a Scoring Guide Based on the AGREE II Instrument and a Web-based Evaluation.
Chang SG; Kim DI; Shin ES; Jang JE; Yeon JY; Lee YS
J Korean Med Sci; 2016 May; 31(5):682-7. PubMed ID: 27134487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appraisal of International Guidelines on Smoking Cessation using the AGREE II Assessment Tool.
Quintyne KI; Kavanagh P
Ir Med J; 2019 Feb; 112(2):867. PubMed ID: 30892001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteoporosis guidelines on TCM drug therapies: a systematic quality evaluation and content analysis.
Zhang L; Li J; Xie R; Zeng L; Chen W; Li H
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1276631. PubMed ID: 38317713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument.
Castellini G; Iannicelli V; Briguglio M; Corbetta D; Sconfienza LM; Banfi G; Gianola S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Oct; 20(1):970. PubMed ID: 33092579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Appraisal of the current guidelines for management of cholangiocarcinoma-using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.
Gavriilidis P; Askari A; Roberts KJ; Sutcliffe RP
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr; 2020 Apr; 9(2):126-135. PubMed ID: 32355672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review and evaluation of the Dutch guidelines for osteoporosis.
Geusens PP; Lems WF; Verhaar HJ; Leusink G; Goemaere S; Zmierczack H; Compston J
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Oct; 12(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16987116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appraisal of guidelines for androgenetic alopecia using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Huang M; Zhou X
J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 26507460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument.
Zhang X; Zhao K; Bai Z; Yu J; Bai F
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2016 Dec; 16(6):439-451. PubMed ID: 27580999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality appraisal of gestational diabetes mellitus guidelines with AGREE II: a systematic review.
Zhang M; Zhou Y; Zhong J; Wang K; Ding Y; Li L; Pan X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):478. PubMed ID: 31805878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for the symptomatic management of fever in children: systematic review of the literature and quality appraisal with AGREE II.
Chiappini E; Bortone B; Galli L; de Martino M
BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e015404. PubMed ID: 28760789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical Appraisal of Paralyzed Veterans of America Guidelines in Spinal Cord Injury: An International Collaborative Study Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument (AGREE II).
Liang N; Wu S; Roberts S; Makaram N; Ngwayi JRM; Porter DE
Mil Med; 2021 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 34791377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
