These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33650978)

  • 1. Comparative Analysis of Paper-Based and Web-Based Versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) Questionnaire in Breast Cancer Patients: Randomized Crossover Study.
    Ma J; Zou Z; Pazo EE; Moutari S; Liu Y; Jin F
    JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Mar; 9(3):e18269. PubMed ID: 33650978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinically meaningful change threshold estimates of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16).
    Clarke NA; Wong B; Lawrance R; Ingelgård A; Griebsch I; Cella D; Trigg A
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2024 Aug; 8(1):97. PubMed ID: 39145900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Reliability Study.
    Matthies LM; Taran FA; Keilmann L; Schneeweiss A; Simoes E; Hartkopf AD; Sokolov AN; Walter CB; Sickenberger N; Wallwiener S; Feisst M; Gass P; Lux MP; Schuetz F; Fasching PA; Sohn C; Brucker SY; Graf J; Wallwiener M
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e10004. PubMed ID: 30668517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priority symptoms in advanced breast cancer: development and initial validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16).
    Garcia SF; Rosenbloom SK; Beaumont JL; Merkel D; Von Roenn JH; Rao D; Cella D
    Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 22264987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Wallwiener M; Matthies L; Simoes E; Keilmann L; Hartkopf AD; Sokolov AN; Walter CB; Sickenberger N; Wallwiener S; Feisst M; Gass P; Fasching PA; Lux MP; Wallwiener D; Taran FA; Rom J; Schneeweiss A; Graf J; Brucker SY
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Sep; 19(9):e322. PubMed ID: 28912116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of Chinese web-based ocular surface disease index questionnaire in dry eye patients: a randomized, crossover study.
    Zhang XM; Yang LT; Zhang Q; Fan QX; Zhang C; You Y; Zhang CG; Lin TZ; Xu L; Moutari S; Moore JE; Pazo EE; He W
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(6):834-843. PubMed ID: 34150537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Content validity of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form with advanced breast cancer patients.
    Krohe M; Tang DH; Klooster B; Revicki D; Galipeau N; Cella D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 May; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 31142325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study.
    Tanaka M; Saito M; Takahashi M; Adachi M; Nakamura K
    JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2021 Feb; 4(1):e20172. PubMed ID: 33455899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Web-based versus paper administration of common ophthalmic questionnaires: comparison of subscale scores.
    Clayton JA; Eydelman M; Vitale S; Manukyan Z; Kramm R; Datiles M; Temple A; Murphy E; Kim J; Hilmantel G; Rorer E; Hammel K; Ferris F
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):2151-9. PubMed ID: 23714321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjuvant platinum versus capecitabine for residual, invasive, triple-negative breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in ECOG-ACRIN EA1131.
    Smith KL; Zhao F; Mayer IA; Tevaarwerk AJ; Garcia SF; Arteaga CL; Symmans WF; Park BH; Burnette BL; Makower DF; Block M; Morley KA; Jani CR; Mescher C; Dewani SJ; Brown-Glaberman U; Flaum LE; Mayer EL; Sikov WM; Rodler ET; DeMichele AM; Sparano JA; Wolff AC; Miller KD; Wagner LI
    Cancer; 2024 May; 130(10):1747-1757. PubMed ID: 38236702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying patients who require a change in their current acute migraine treatment: the Migraine Assessment of Current Therapy (Migraine-ACT) questionnaire.
    Dowson AJ; Tepper SJ; Baos V; Baudet F; D'Amico D; Kilminster S
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Jul; 20(7):1125-35. PubMed ID: 15265257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.
    Salaffi F; Malavolta N; Cimmino MA; Di Matteo L; Scendoni P; Carotti M; Stancati A; Mulé R; Frigato M; Gutierrez M; Grassi W;
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2007; 25(3):390-403. PubMed ID: 17631735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative validity and reliability of the WeChat-based electronic and paper-and-pencil versions of the PISQ-12 for collecting participant-reported data in Chinese.
    Zhang C; Sun Z; Yang J; Xu T; Zhu L; Lang J
    Menopause; 2020 Nov; 28(3):318-324. PubMed ID: 33201029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of the test-retest reliability of the New Nordic Diet score.
    Bjørnarå HB; Hillesund ER; Torstveit MK; Stea TH; Øverby NC; Bere E
    Food Nutr Res; 2015; 59():28397. PubMed ID: 26268707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The usability of a WeChat-based electronic questionnaire for collecting participant-reported data in female pelvic floor disorders: a comparison with the traditional paper-administered format.
    Sun ZJ; Zhu L; Liang M; Xu T; Lang JH
    Menopause; 2016 Aug; 23(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 27326820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS): an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress.
    Browall M; Kenne Sarenmalm E; Nasic S; Wengström Y; Gaston-Johansson F
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Jul; 46(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 23195392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
    Monticone M; Ferrante S; Vernon H; Rocca B; Dal Farra F; Foti C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):E1038-44. PubMed ID: 22487712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability and comparability of paper and computer questionnaires for the Finnish version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.
    Koho P; Aho S; Kautiainen H; Pohjolainen T; Hurri H
    Physiotherapy; 2014 Dec; 100(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 24679373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paper-Based Versus Web-Based Versions of Self-Administered Questionnaires, Including Food-Frequency Questionnaires: Prospective Cohort Study.
    Zazpe I; Santiago S; De la Fuente-Arrillaga C; Nuñez-Córdoba JM; Bes-Rastrollo M; Martínez-González MA
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2019 Oct; 5(4):e11997. PubMed ID: 31573924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.