These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33651679)

  • 1. Pulse Shaping Strategies for Electroceuticals: A Comprehensive Survey of the Use of Interphase Gaps in Miniature Stimulation Systems.
    Eickhoff S; Jarvis JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 May; 68(5):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 33651679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Sub-Threshold Pre-Pulses on Neural Activation Depends on Electrode Configuration.
    Eickhoff S; Jarvis JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Sep; 67(9):2552-2559. PubMed ID: 31905132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness Perception and Dynamic Range Depending on Interphase Gaps of Biphasic Pulses in Cochlear Implants.
    Pieper SH; Brill S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 31972773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation.
    McKay CM; Henshall KR
    Hear Res; 2003 Jul; 181(1-2):94-9. PubMed ID: 12855367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Macherey O; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):154-63. PubMed ID: 18468821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical simulation of neural excitation during brain tumor ablation by microsecond pulses.
    Guo F; Zhou W; Luo Z
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2024 Jun; 160():108752. PubMed ID: 38852384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
    Mens LH; Berenstein CK
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants.
    Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Nov; 1(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 11545227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?
    Hughes ML; Choi S; Glickman E
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():50-63. PubMed ID: 29307495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Anodic Phase Can Facilitate Rather Than Weaken a Cathodic Phase to Activate Neurons in Biphasic-Pulse Axonal Stimulations.
    Zheng L; Feng Z; Xu Y; Yuan Y; Hu Y
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():823423. PubMed ID: 35368280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Nourski KV; Hu N; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):200-14. PubMed ID: 12527139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational analysis of electrode structure and configuration for efficient and localized neural stimulation.
    Choi JH; Moon J; Park YH; Eom K
    Biomed Eng Lett; 2024 Jul; 14(4):717-726. PubMed ID: 38946826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative efficacy of monopolar vs. bipolar electrodes in stimulation-produced analgesia.
    Thorn BE; Applegate L; Jones K
    Exp Brain Res; 1990; 79(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 2323373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
    Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.